Others Judgements

Displaying 60 - 70 of 483 in 49 pages

1 year time limit to claim refund under Rule 5 of CCR reckoned from the date of receipt of export proceeds and not from date of export of services

 04 May 2016

The Hon’ble CESTAT, Bangalore held that although there is no specific 'relevant date' under Section 11B of the Excise Act to claimrefund of unutilized credit, but, that would not rule out applicability of Section 11B. Relevant date should be the date

Posted in Others 3 comments |   3781 hits


Rebate of Excise duty admissible on both inputs & final products

 04 May 2016

Hon’ble Apex Court held that it cannot be the intention of the Legislature to provide rebate only on one item i.e. either on inputs or final products. It was further held that giving such restrictive meaning to Rule 18 of the Excise Rules would not o

Posted in Others |    0 comments |   3609 hits


Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not 'goods' within the meaning of Section 2(25) of the Act and, therefore, not liable for either Octroi or LBT

 18 December 2015

We are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court has not discussed and decided the issue correctly and warrants interference. We, thus, allow these appeals and set aside the judgment of the High Court by holding that Sodexo Meal Vouchers are

Posted in Others |    0 comments |   3981 hits


NJAC out after SC strikes down 99th Constitutional Amendment

 16 October 2015

The collegium system of judicial appointments is here to stay. The Supreme Court today declared the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), and the Constitutional amendments involved, to be in violation of the Constitution of India.

Posted in Others 14 comments |   4019 hits


Stamp Act applicable to State of M. P. (Stamp Duty on POA when given to Non-Relative)

 13 August 2015

Judgement of Hon’ble Mr. Lodha (J) & Mr. Gokhale (J) in Civil Appeal No. 684/2004 State of MP v/s Rakesh Kohli delivered on May 11, 2012 w.r.t. Stamp Act applicable to State of M. P. (Stamp Duty on POA when given to Non-Relative)

Posted in Others 2 comments |   4774 hits


Urgent need for measures to checkmate prejudice to large sections of general public

 22 July 2015

Judgments of the higher court/s and/or the Apex Court are either per incuriam and/or stare-decisis and/or against the doctrine of Pith N Substance and/or Ultra Vires and/or otherwise untenable looking to the ground realities. Such judgments remain

Posted in Others 2 comments |   3859 hits


SC: Guidelines for govt. ads

 15 May 2015

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Pinaki Chandra Ghose prescribed detailed guidelines on the issuing of government advertisements.

Posted in Others 8 comments |   6701 hits


SC: Dishonour of cheque

 01 May 2015

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices J. Chelameswar and Pinaki Chandra Ghose held that the printed date on the cheque, in absence of any other evidence, cannot be conclusive of the fact that the cheque was issued on that particular date.

Posted in Others 22 comments |   11987 hits


Whether levy of service-tax on Advocates is Constitutional – Article 19(1)(g)

 22 December 2014

The Petitioner is an Indian citizen and a practicing Advocate. He claims to be affected by the levy of Service Tax on Advocates. It is the case of the Petitioner that section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act 200

Posted in Others 12 comments |   7526 hits


Whether capital receipts received by an assessee on issue of equity shares to its non-resident holding entity and the short-fall between fair market price and issue price of its equity shares can b

 13 October 2014

The Petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., is a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident company, Vodafone Tele-Services (India) Holdings Limited (the holding company). In AY 2009-10,the Petitioner issued equity shares on a premium to its ho

Posted in Others 1 comments |   4078 hits










×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu