I am sorry. The Order does touch on photographs. No politician , no party irrespective of what be spared. - Feel there need be a cap on number of insertions in a year. Only extraordinary cases need be allowed beyond that. Not the way it is happening today.
Common Cause and Centre for Public Interest Litigation - Petitioners have done a yeoman service. Common man would not have been able to do this as well.
In this context, following points need be highlighted:-
1. This Order is silent on using Politician's photograph.
2. This Order has to be publicised amongst all Public watch dogs & there should be suits against Gvts all across for violations.
महोदय जी मैं ये जानना चाहता हु की आरक्षण जो की बहुत ही जरुरी है शायद भारत में, के जरिये सरकारी पदों पर भर्ती होने वाले लोगो को भर्ती करने के पीछे उन्हें समाज के मुख्यधारा में लाने का मकसद होता होगा शायद ।
फिर जब उन्हें समाज के मुख्यधारा से जोड़ दिया गया तो फिर उन्हें पदोन्नति में आरक्षण क्यों दिया जाता है।
क्या ये समानता के अधिकार का हनन नहीं है।
कृपया मुझे मेरे ईमेलआईडी bheemkumarmishra91@gmail. com पे बताने की कृपा करें।
First of all committee framed should ask public views also.Secondly saying anything of work/s done by Govt legally are for vote purpose and not be allowed.Charges of wrong ads should be debited in parties accounts.
Really good guidlune
Good... Nice point.
Advertisement for public interests or any other programmes taken up by the Government does not need any photograph of the Ministers or their subordinates, SAVE HON'BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA.
Biswanath Roy, Senior Advocate.
Two types of advertisements are there. One is issued in public interests by different departments and different ministries.others are mainly about credit claiming ads and glorifying pol parties and personalities. The later type of govt ads must be banned.
You need to be logged in to post comment
Our Network Sites
Join LAWyersclubindia.com and Share your Knowledge. Registered members get a chance to interact at Forum, Ask Query, Comment etc.
Alternatively, you can log in using: