"You remind me of my wife. She also dig-out blames in me like you in islam . Like there is nothing good in me & islam."
Only God knows if your wife was telling a truth. You are unnecessarily getting angry. Where I have blamed you or Islam? I have only asked you to use your conscience as a human being from a neutral position and presented the facts as they are. Now it is upto you if you want to accept the facts or not. Tell me if I have written or claimed anything that is false?
"Read my query first. 1st of all I ask who to vote ? I don't want to heat up the hindu-muslim argument here. You are such type of people who bend healthy discussion to wrong way & spoil generations. "taang adana zaroori hai ?""
I have only answered your question. In that I asked you to apply your conscience as a human being from neutral position before voting. Have I said something false?
"2nd , You have search only bad things out of islam. How can you find good things when you only searched for bad things ?"
I never said anything bad. I only presented facts as they are. Are you saying that there are both good and bad things in Islam just like any other religion and all this is not a "word of God"? If this is what you are saying then I apreciate your honesty to accept the facts. This world needs honest people like you.
"I can't defence right now as I am not prepare for your above blames. As you have done research in finding ill-things in islam. I also say a lot bad about hindusim. But as I am young educated indian want to leave all these things behind."
What defence can one take against indefensible ideas except give some lame excuses or justifications? Where have I blamed anyone? You are jumping to conclusions unneccessarily. I only presented the facts as they are.
"An example of my findings is here. Ram samudre view in following post. http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Crime-against-women-on-the-rise-in-Delhi-India-Today-37730.asp"
First of all I do not give much importance to views of Ram Samudre becuase of his well known biases and prejudices. He has only one goal of following his political agenda whether right or wrong. Since you provided one link, I also provide you some links to read. Please read the following to know how women are systemetically subjected to crime, abused and tortured(all with religious sanction):
"One thing I have to say there is a difference between ," kafir" & "Hindu" or "christian" etc."
One thing I have to say that there is NO difference between "kafir" & "Hindu" or "christian" etc. because they are human beings first then anything else. This is the fundamental difference between your thinking and my thinking and hence the problem.
"PLEASE NOTE- India is a golden bird during mughal period. Not before that & not after that."
Golden Age for people of India was during the rule by Gupta Dynasty not during Mughal rule. Mughal rule was nothing but "Golden Age" for Islamic terrorism, tyranny and oppression. Jihadist Babur invaded and terrorised entire India. Thousands of places of worship destroyed, women raped, enslaved, millions of people killed. What a golden begining for a "golden" rule by terrorism! People of India do not ever need such "golden rules". People of Afghanistan and Pakistan are already enjoying such "Golden rules" today, but we do not need such "golden rules" to spread in India. Entire world has seen the attempt to begin the "Golden rule" on 26/11.
Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilizations (Penguin 1988/1963, p. 232-236), Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."
After his formal accession in Delhi (5th June 1659) he posed as a defender of Islam who would rule according to the directions of the Shariat, and with the advice of the Clerics or Ulama for whom the doctrines, rules, principles and directives, as laid down and interpreted in the 7th and 8th century Arabia, Persia and Iraq, were inviolable and unchangeable in all conditions, in all countries, and for all times to come.
The number of such ruthless acts of Aurangzeb make a long list but here only a few have been mentioned, supported by evidence, mostly contemporary official records of Aurangzeb's period and by such credible Persian sources as Maasir-i-Alamgiri.
In obedience to the Quranic injunction, he reimposed Jizyah on the Hindus on 2nd April 1679 (Exhibit No. 16)
For details refer http://www.aurangzeb.info/ especially the exhibits on the lower right hand side of the page.
"Better argue anywhere else , here topic is whom to vote."
Yes that is exactly what I told you, to whom to vote by using your consciense afer evaluating the facts.
"Your miss-representation of islam & lack of knowledge cannot make me vote BJP."
Again you are getting defensive and jumping to conclusions, where I have said anything against you or Islam. Tell me if that I have written is not what is actually written? Vote as per your consciense, who can compel anyone to vote for BJP or any other party? Also don't forget to check the past record of Congress in playing double game of fooling Muslims.