'X' bought a property in 1947. those papers received from Archive and it is found that his fathers name is Mohan Ram and those documents bear his full signature along with his surnam, say "Dharmapal".
'Y' claims to have bought the above said property from 'X' but he does not show those papers in court and becomes 'exparte'. On our personal enquiry, it is found that Y's documents shows the name of X's father as Haveli ram and also doesnot bear the full signature of 'x". it has the signatures of 'X' only as Dharma and that too is totally different. In his signautre 'pal' is totally missing. he also not able to show the original documents of 'X' from whom he claims to have bought the property.
So on the basis of different father name and different signature, his papers can stated to be fraudelent. and on whom lies the onus to prove the documents. can those papers be sent to handwriting expert.