Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Haleema MS (Business)     07 November 2010

Transfer of property act(106)

Lease period was expired on 31/12/2009. But plaintiff sent a letter dated 10/08/2009 and a letter dated 20/11/2009 indicatinf to vacate the premises on 31/12/2009. Both the same letters were entered in the list of documents and also at the time of plaintiff's evidence both the letters marked as exhibits. Before the expiry period, letter was sent by plaintiff. Whether the letter admissable or inadmissable? Because the letter was sent before expiry date. If inadmissable, can i file interlocatory application for strike off the letter? Suit was filed for ejectment under transfer of property act 106. 



Learning

 2 Replies

RohitChhaba (n/a)     07 November 2010

the letter admissable (in evidence)........ premature letter does not bar its admissibility


(Guest)

It is an documentary evidence.  Moreover it is relating to the case.  It is a relevant document.  So that it can be marked. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register