Upgrad LLM

big b- why the change of heart?

retd personal

Big B of Bolly wood at long last made it Kwaja' s Darbar today. So far he was making upten number of trips to Siddi Vinayak in Mumbai and generously donating money there. By becoming Ambassador to the state of Gujarat  he showed his true Hindu MANUWADI MANHOOS colour. 

Now he is visiting Dargas and not Hindu temples , Why? Is there a change of heart or there is some compulsions? 

 
Reply   
 
self employed

now this is his personal choice

 
Reply   
 



kyoki BUDDHA HOGA TERA BAAP!

 
Reply   
 

Its his  personal choice:  Kya pata issse picture(Buddha Hoga ...) hit ho jayee!

 

Article 25 Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.

 
Reply   
 
retd personal

Public figures have no personal choice. Big B must clarify.

 
Reply   
 
Scientist/Engineer

Mr. Haridas Mandal:

"Public figures have no personal choice. Big B must clarify."

If they have no personal choice, whom should they consult?  You?

 
Reply   
 
retd personal

Dear Dr Ramani

Whom you are trying to protect- A bollywood Shahensha, a big idle Farmer or Simply a upper caste celebrity?

If you can honestly answer this I will tell you whom he should consult. 

 
Reply   
 
Banana Master

mr. mandal have some anti hindu agenda.

 
Reply   
 
retd personal

Now it becomes an anti-hindu agenda. Any lower caste Hindu here think alike?

 
Reply   
 
Scientist/Engineer

Amitabh Bachan was just an actor engaged in his profession. People who saw his films made him Shahen Shah. Politicians claim that they serve the people or that they want to serve the people. So they are public figures. An actor just does his chosen vocation. At the most they are passive public figures. They are not answerable to the public for things they do in their private life. And who is this idle farmer, Amitabh Bachan? I never knew he was or he is a farmer, idle or busy. Yes, he is a celebrity. And it is just another word for Shahenshah.

 

Does Amitabh Bachan belong to upper caste? To be best of my knowledge he is a Kayastha. He is neither a Brahmin, a Kshatriya nor a Vaishya. He is a Shudra belonging to the lowest of the four castes. How can you say he belongs to upper caste? If you want, you can also claim to be an upper caste, but at the cost of losing special reservations.

 

And who was Manu? Was he a historic person or a fictitious person? What did he preach and when did he live? Most of the people, who are stamped as Manuvadis, do not know the answer to any of the questions above. Only Mayavathi uses the word to get political mileage.

 

One of the things which Manu prohibited was inter-caste marriage, especially pratiloma marriage. But Yayati who was a Kshatriya, married Devayani, a Brahmin girl. No one punished him for that and he continued to be king. Lord Krishna was his descendant. Ramayana was said to be written by Valmiki. And who was Valmiki? He was a scheduled tribe man, who later became a Rishi. Again he defied Manu. Who was the author of Mahabharatha? It was Vedavyasa, son of a fisher-woman. He also defied Manu. Manuvadi is just a word of political abuse, which has no basis. Narendra Modi is caricatured as a bad man. He may really be a bad man. But Ratan Tata and Aziz Premji are willing to do business with him If Amitabh Bachan choses to do business with him that is his business. In any case today, if anyone wants to work for Gujarat’s good, they cannot do it ignoring Modi  .

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x