Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

M. PIRAVI PERUMAL (Advocate & Consumer Rights)     23 April 2011

Anna Hazare Approach Coercive

Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and historian K N Panikkar on Friday raised questions on Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement, accusing him of adopting an “authoritarian” approach in selecting civil society members in the joint drafting committee on Lokpal Bill.

They also took exception to Hazare’s praise of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi as one cannot ignore the menace of “communal corruption” and said the anti-graft legislation proposed by his group was “flawed” as it gave overriding powers to a group of people.

“Methods adopted by Hazare to press his demand have an element of coercion, as he has left no room for discussion, debate and exchange of views. There is no true representation of civil society in the joint committee. He has adopted an authoritarian approach,” Bhatt told a joint press conference in New Delhi on Friday.

Panikkar said the proposed Jan Lokpal Bill was “full of flaws” as it gave overriding powers of investigation and punishment to a group of people. “The real problem is the centralisation of authority. This has not been addressed by the Bill,” he said, expressing fears that the legislation would create a “permanent state of emergency” as it went against the principles of democracy.



Learning

 7 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     23 April 2011

I have a premonition that there is an element to confuse the real issue with unnecessary voices over this issues, which we all know, and that was kept in cold storage for nearly half a century by our representatives in the Parliament like Gaddafi of Libya. And when the issue surface very strongly the issue is misleaded by procedural issues and personal scathing attacks on Anna Hazare, in spite of asking the Parliament why they are hesitating and why they have hesitiated to Legislate the Bills for the last half a century. We should focus on the issue whether Parliament is going to Legislate or not and also ensure that the Bill is properly drafted so that introduction of the Bill and the enactment are the same.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     23 April 2011

DEAR  MR. PIRAVI PERUMAL  

ARE YOU CORRUPTED AND THEREFORE AFFRAID OF THE -  PROPOSED BILL?

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     23 April 2011

There will always be people who criticise whatever you do.

 

what is the history and background of Bhat 1) his son was involved with terrorists and 2) he selling s*x of his own daughter for money on films. WHAT A PROGRESSIVE PERSON.

M. PIRAVI PERUMAL (Advocate & Consumer Rights)     23 April 2011

You are questing the morality/integrity of Mr. Bhat for critising the Lokpal Bill Committee. When the civil society thinks that only person with his morality/integrity  can critisize the Lokpal Committee Members, ? Then what is wrong in people expecting that person with high morality/integrity alone must be the Lokpal Committee Members.  Caesar's wife must be above suspicion . . .      

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     23 April 2011

" Then what is wrong in people expecting that person with high morality/integrity alone must be the Lokpal Committee Members "

 

---   first of all, people wants a strong lokpal bill.

secondly, people wants the act comes as early as possible.

people do not like delay anymore.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     23 April 2011

" seeing the pending bill last 42 years, people is now on mood that - let the bill place before the perliament first,  then people will see what is the stand of our perliamenterians on the bill."

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     23 April 2011

APPROACH OF ANNA HAZARE COERCIVE TO  CORRUPT PEOPLE ONLY.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register