i think the lawyer is guiding her perfectly.
DV Case is actually for restoration of conjugal rights also;not just for maintenance and cruelty.
if a lady demands restoration to her matrimonial home,doesnt it mean she's trying to save her marriage.
so where's misguidance here?
infact, RCR is a time consuming process...
in DV the magistrate can give orders that she be allowed to live in her mat. home with full protection...
the lawyer is not asking her to file any false 498A.if he had advised her this for saving her marriage,then it wud have been misguidance.