SIR/ MADAM,
IN MY CASE, THERE IS DISPUTE BETWEEN THE TWO BROTHERS. ELDER ONE (PLAINTIFF) HAD PURCHASED A ROOM IN CHAWL FROM THE OWNER IN 1980. HE WAS RESIDING THERE WITH HIS FAMILY MEMBERS AND YOUNGER BROTHER TILL 2006. LATER ON PLAINTIFF WENT TO HIS NATIVE PLACE DUE TO HIS POOR HEALTH, LEAVING BEHIND HIS YOUNGER BROTHER (DEFENDANT) AT THE SUIT PREMISES. LATER ON HIS YOUNGER BROTHER MADE SEVERAL DOCUMENTS USING THE ADDRESS ON HIS NAME I.E. RATION CARD (1987), AADHAR CARD ETC. PLAINTIFF HAS DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWING CORRECT ADDRESS OF THE SUIT PREMISES.
WHILE RECORDING EVIDENCE, PLAINTIFF WITNESS APPEARD AND SUBMITS THAT SAME SUIT PREMISES WAS PURCHASED BY THE PLAINTIFFND SUBMITTED THE ORIGINAL NON- NOTERISED AGGREMENT OF 1980 . DEFENDANT CLAIMING THAT HE HAS TAKEN ON RENT THIS PREMISES FROM THE OWNER BUT IN EVIDENCE DURING CROSS EXAMINATION ACCEPTED THAT SUIT PREMISES WAS CONSTUCTED BY HIM AND NOT RENTED.
MY QUESTION IS WHAT WILL BE THE EFFECTS ON THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF EVIDENCE AND WITNESS IF HE WAS NOT CROSS EXAMINED BY THE DEFENDANT?
WILL THE DOCUMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED OR NOT?
ANY OTHER HELP?
