Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate)     22 October 2012

Order 8 rule 10

CPC :  U/O 8  R 10:  Non Filig of Written Statment - Effect of -

 Cout canno pas decree ina mechanialmanner.  It shoul be little more cautius.  Een if facts stated n plaint ar admitted.  Jdgement cannot be psedwithout requiring plainiff to prove facts s peaded.

KCCR 201 ( S.N. 117 ( SC ) Page No: 164 Part 18



Learning

 2 Replies

ashok kumar (Social Worker)     05 December 2012

Can you give the reference of this judgement?

I mean the details

ashok kumar (Social Worker)     05 December 2012

can u help me with this?

 

 

(i) Is there any legal way out if one does not wish to file a written reply and yet retain his right to file a reply later on if the Order 7 Rule 11 Application is not decided in his favour?

 

(iv) Does the stipulation of 90 days period run even if the Order 7 Rule 11 Application which was filed, is not argued or decided for no fault of the defendant or the defendant has a right to get a time waiver in this respect? 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register