Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rouf (scientist)     28 July 2012

Section 406

My question is whether the case under section 406 ipc is made out in the following situation..

 

Criminal case was filed by complainant against the accused under section 406 claiming that her jewellery was lying in the bank locker under joint operation of complainant and accused.It was further stated that accused didnt return the jewellery back to her despite of request.It was further stated that all jewellery belongs to her and accused poses hurdles in a way by not allowing the access to the bank locker in view of key lying with him.Magestrate recorded the statement of the complainant and her witnesses on oath and returned the finding of not being satisfied with the statement of the complainant and her witness on oath.he directed for police investigation under section 202 crpc.it was stated in the police report that all the jewellery is lying in the bank locker with the key in the possesion of complainant and nothing has been misappropriated.Despite of the police report magestrate took the cognizance.Was magestrate legally justified to take the cognizance despite of police report nothing to justify any thing incriminating,,and magestrate not satisfied to issue any process against the accused prior to police investigation in his own contained order.Kindly clearify.



Learning

 5 Replies

vinod sharma (personal)     28 July 2012

SOME IDIOTS ARE SITTING AND MAKING FOOLISH ORDERS IN ORDER TO PLEASE THE WOMEN AS BY DOING  SHE WILL SLEEP WITH HIM . WHEN THE JWELLRY IS NOT IN YOUR POSESSION AND IN JOINT LOCKER AND NOTHING HAS BEEN MISPROPORTIONATE AND POLICAHAS FILED NEGATIVE REPORT  THEN HOW CAN HE TAKE COGNIZZANCE . FILE COMPLAINT AGAINST  HIM IN HIGH COURT . NO CASE IS MADE OUT  U/S 406

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     17 August 2012

you have been advised well on other thread at https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/criminal-325911.asp

SuperNuvos (Own)     20 August 2015

Can any expert clarify if all the articles kept in a joint locker becomes streedhan by default?

adv.raghavan (Advocate,9444674980)     21 August 2015

It depends upon the claim made by aggrieved party.

SuperNuvos (Own)     23 August 2015

@Raghavan: Aggrieved party will always treat it as streedhan. Do you agree?

Can we argue otherwise if there are no written list of articles kept in the locker?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register