Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Subramanian.V (NA)     13 March 2011

Gratuity

Dear Sir,

PSUs have been following in tandem the ceiling for Gratuity though there is no written rule. I would like your advice on my following statement from legal parlance:

"Sir, you are aware that ceiling amount for payment of gratuity for employees of PSUs were being raised in tandem to such ceiling amounts to Government employees as a practice though there is no rule (I am aware that employees of  PSUs & Government are covered by different Acts/Rules). It is also a fact that precedence of decisions act as rule of Law."

Is my last sentence correct in legal parlance? Otherwise I request you to suggest me the correct way of putting it.

Subramanian.V


Share This

 


Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register