Can judge call for custody of an accused in another case in some other part of the state and under trial

Sir, 

Seek bail in that other case as well if the offence is bailable, rather you can use the present bail order to seek bail in another case. 

Warm Regards 

Kapil Chandna Advocate 

9899011450,9911218741 

https://kapilchandna.legal/

what are facts of the case?              

Sudhir Sir, 

There is an accused from Maharashtra, who has 2 cases one in Court A of Karnataka and another in another court Court B of Karnataka. ( A and B are 2 different districts of Karnataka)

The accused was on bail in the Court A-Karnataka case and since one year taking EP's through his advocate, but in the Court B-Karnataka case, where there is an Arrest Warrant, the accused has never appeard and is hiding for more than a year.

Since the accused is the same in the 2 different crimes reported against him the 2 different courts of Karnataka, and currently has Non Bailable Arrest Warrants from both the courts.

Can the judge of Court B (where he has never ever appeard ) ask Court A (Where he is gaing EP through his advocate) to hold this person immediately in custody and facilitate his presence to Court B.

Could you please draw some light on this.

How are you connected to the mater.

I am a relative of the complainants.

The same accused has masterminded the opening of NGO with the aim to cheat people in the name of Cancer Patient Children under the Maharashtra Charity Commission.

We had brough the matter to light to the Commissioner of Charity and are waiting for his response on the investigation report that the Commission is working on.

Sir, such people need to see the prison soon before more innocent and vulnerable be his next victims.

If you know anything that could help please provide your support.

I know your sharing of knowledge will not give any financial gain, but it will avoide other families being cheated and what is collected in the name of Cancer Patient Children or even others could be given back to the rightful and that I call a blessing for life.

you have still not stated what problem you are facing.

The accused has cheated my family with a big amount in lakhs claiming to be funder for their business.

Even after all legal documents were done for the same and whole transaction done lawfully cheating was done. We later came to know that this person was on Bail for his Fake Gold Selling case in Karnataka, with this you can guess of his level of cheating.

If we had done little more finding before even signing the legal agreement done through a legitimate advocate, things would not have gone to this extent.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Since your case is complicated case as such I require documents and same may be send to my email/PM (personal mail) for detailed legal advise.

With regards,

Legal Expert

you are chosing to hide facts as much as possible.

please explain what do you mean by

"funder for their business"

have you lent any money to friend and relatives.

There is nothing to hide Sudhir Sir,

you asked for

"guidance based on your experience and knowlegde"

OK read as under

Money given to friends and relatives is always a charity in the garb of loan which is given in expectation of refund but always taken with intention of non-refund.

Such loan is taken by a person:-

1. Who lacks business sense and cannot raise funds out of his own business and suddenly wants to be rich.

1. who cannot raise bank loan because :-

Either

he himself is not creditworthy

Or

 the purpose for which he seeks loan is illegal

or

the purpose for which he seeks loan is not at all commercially viable.

1.  Who knows he can afford not to refund.
2. Who trusts his thick skin
3. Who intends not to refund
4. Who has made fortification against action of refund.

So he has to find someone who can part with his money. SO he finds a lender near him (friend or relative)

Such loans are given by the persons :-

1. Who has surplus money.
2. Who displays and boasts of such surplus money.
3. Who stupidly believe that there will be a refund.
4. Fails to realise as to why he alone (not bank) is being contacted for loan.
5. Who has extreme trust on the debtor
6. who are either stupid or extremely greedy of the unusual (or illegal) rate of interest.

Such loans are always given

1. Without documentation.
2. Without witness
3. Without guarantor.
4. During cordial relations

Soon after giving such loan :-

1. Relations are no more remain cordial
2. Business started by such money  (easy money belonging to other) invariably fails.
3. Such loans always sink and not refunded.
4. Person seeking such refund suffers at legal process.
5. Person seeking such refund legally or by persualtion is socially criticised.

Sir, your reply on this matter as my expectation shows an in depth exposure of yours on this matter. Though I have not got a reply on my question on a judges right to communicate to the judge of another court, but still conversation with you will help me a lot forsure.

Sir, if you are ok can we continue this conversation.

Sir, Bank loans are reliable and secure but come with a itch of credit limit granted. Small/Medium enterprenurs, find it difficult to raise loans on genuine business propositions as credit limit binds the business activities.

This drives a business to go ahead with association with financially capable people as partners or lenders. 

To enter into any agreement the capability of both the parties to contract/ agreement are to be clarified to each other before. If the person doing a agreement to fund at the time of getting into an agreement does not have the fund he promises to grant, the agreement becomes by default void, and the party who is responsible for such situation inturn becomes a criminal for cheating which is a punishable offence under Sec420 of CRPC.

When that be the case the agreived party is legally authorised to claim appropriate action against the accused.

Currently with the CCTNS and other systems working, this person attempting similar crimes again could be checked for his actions, and possibly any other business or family be spared for losing their valuables.

So coming back to my original question" Do you have idea about the Judges authority of ask for custody from another Judge of the accused"