1. The fact of your case is that your son did not take her with her when he went abroad when he soon left for Canada within 10 days after marriage and while he was in India he had received abuses over the phone by his brother in law as why he was not taking his siter with him and being aggrived by such abuses your son had demanded aploy from him conveyed through his wife who at that time was at her parental residence. And later your duagther in law was at your residnce one day she informed your wife that she was having severe headaches and in such situation your wife then asked her to go along with her to see a doctor at a pricvate hospital but your daughter in law mentioned that she had already taken 10 tablets of Avil ( which is a an anti-allergy drug and which is not life threating if taken in more quatity at one time )- but she refused to see a doctor and you then had infomed her parents and who then on the next following day took her away from your residence to a Govt. Hospital and have had got her treated and obatianed medical reprots and then later they filed a complaint before the poilce who after making prliminary investigation have recorded a F.I.R. u/s 498-A & s. 406 of I.P.C. and that you all have got A.B.
2. The poilce must have filed the charge sheet before the court trial court who then must have transferred (commited) the case to the Sessions court and all the evidences and recovery made by the police have been called by the Sessions Judge.
3. Now you must have received summons for appeareance before the sessions court on 21-5-2015 but then you need not be worried. Engage an advocate and appear alongwith him on the sceduled date and file application for regular bail before the Sessions Court ( as the A.B. was limited till the time the case matter was being investigated) and most likely the proceedings would be adjourned and posted for futher heraing on a next date.
4. On such next date your advocate can submitt a Cr.Misc. Application u/s 227 of Cr.P.C. 1973 before the session Judge seeking discharge of all the accsued on merits that there are no sufficient evidneces that can support any casue of mental cruelty for to attract the provision of s. 498-A I.P.C. since the fact that your son had not taken her alongwith her to Canada soon after the marraige and which he could have done only after completion of the required formalities does not provide any casue for your daughter in law to have attempted to injure her self by consuming 10 tablets of Avil which are just anti-allergy drugs and would not have casued severe complications to her health or therats to her life and such fact then do not attract the provision of s. 498-A 0r s. 406 I.P.C.
5. Chances are that the court may rule out the merits of the F.I.R. recorded by the police as baseless. Your dicharge application may survive. Otherwise you have another remedy to file a Cr.Misc. Application u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. 1973, before the H.C. seeking quashing of the F.I.R.
6. If need be and you feel you need more appriasal on legal procedural laws you can opt to have direct paid phone consultation with this lawyer provided that you are willing and agree to pay a moderate sum of Rs. 500.00 as renumeration for such purpose.
5. You can get my contact details by clicking upon my name shown in the L.H.S. margin of this reply format.
