Respected Members,
(Actually “A’ had lent loan to main land owner "B" on financial transaction with undue influence of using unsigned stamp papers and giving life threat to the main land owner and for that reason Sale deed entered with fictitious dimension mentioned )
As per the Sale deed recitals “A” Purchased property from main land owner ‘B’ who had 5 Acres of Land
Boundary of Property in the sale deed is given properly.
Property Descriptttttion for property shown in sale deed as100 * 250 as approx 57 Cents Approximately
But the Property is not as per the dimension of perfect rectangle, property widdth reduces actually in property so Purchaser “A” had himself occupied the land in excess and fit the land as per the 57 cent requirement extending the length of plot as per his wish.
Subsequently other purchasers had purchased the property from the same main land owner ” B” in which dimensions are not mentioned, only boundary and extent is mentioned in theirs sale deed.
Now, few years back,
“A” had given forged copy of sale deed to Revenue authority “The Sub Divisional Magistrate” without mentioning any dimension and got land mutation and Sub Division of Land as per the forged copy of sale deed.
In such circumstance,
Whether Criminal action could be initiated against “A” by subsequent purchaser?
What could be Civil Relief?
Even without the rectification deed, in this circumstance
Whether “A” can claim his right as per Section 95 of Evidence Act which allows extrinsic evidence may be given?
Whether subsequently “A’ is entitled to rectification deed to approach the Civil court of equity after his conduct in giving forged copy of sale deed to Sub Divisional Magistrate?
