Laws are wrong since they are against husband. Girls due to feminists  think wrong. SO they are almost always responsinble and at falut nowadays.

Practically wifes get child coustody. They also get divorce at police stations, NCW etc, by threats of arrest without investigation laws. Maintenance laws are one sided 125 CRpC, DV whicg are fatser. Husbands are rediculed if they ask for maintenance.

Everything on wims of wifes.

Dowry death happens since husbands have no other choise. You make divorce easier. 498a bailable 96% so called dowry deaths will vanish.

Persons do not get bail for years in dowry death who would eant to kill wife and distroy his life, if yiu guve any chance of justise ti him.

UNDERSTAN DOWRY DEATH FIGURES MEAN MORE TORTURE OF HUSBADS, IMPOSSIBLE DIVORE AND NOTHING ELSe.

Wifes do not contribute finantially in household even if they are working is the mojority. Get real of todays toimes.

@ sandeep

this thread title is not discussing mischevious women who intend to extort money.

it's talking about those genuine wronged women who have to face the unfriendly staff of courts,long adjourments etc...

,you'll understand what she means.

it'[s another thing that certain members have misunderstood this point that the author of this thread was sayinng and diverted this issue into false 498A cases,women extortionists,etc

even i dont support false cases by women becoz of whom genuine cases also suffer.

so please dont talk about your personal issues here that women are this that etc etc...you may start a separate thread just to focus on women extotionists,bad wives,etc..no body is stopping you.

thanks in anticipation

Goodone Roshni ji, i agree with you.

Another such case to suggest that matrimonial laws and the courts are not so sensitive towards poor women,or towards those women who do not have the backing of a strong lawyer and society

So their cases drag for years,even for a very basic thing like maintenance.The so called favouritism towards women,that is claimed on legal papers is merely an illusion,when it comes to women who cannot exercise influence.

32 years later, woman gets maintenance

PUNE: After 32 years of legal battle, a 53-year-old woman succeeded in getting maintenance from her husband. The court of additional sessions judge O P Jaiswal on Tuesday directed the husband to pay one-time settlement amount of Rs 70,000 to her.

The man and the woman had got married in 1978. The relation between the couple turned sour soon and they were separated after three months.

In 1979, the woman, a resident of village Mandki in Purandar taluka, had approached a lower court in Saswad, claiming her right to get alimony from her husband who was then employed with the ammunition factory in Khadki. However, her application was rejected.

The woman then moved the Pune district sessions court in 1981. The sessions court ordered the husband to start paying an amount of Rs 125 to her towards alimony, but he failed to do so for the next 26 years. Meanwhile, the man also remarried.

With no other source of income, the woman filed an application before a court in Saswad in 2008 to enhance the alimony amount to Rs 1,500 per month. In July 2009, judicial magistrate first class A A Kulkarni directed the man to pay Rs 1,000 per month to her.

By then, the man has retired from his service. He moved the sessions court against this order through lawyer Biju Aloor. Lawyer S V Shivarkar represented the woman. When the case came up for hearing, the court asked the petitioner and respondent to settle the matter as it has been 30 years since the first order. The matter reached the 'Mahalok Adalat', but it was not settled and the case was referred to the court.

The parties agreed to settle the matter with Rs 70,000 as one-time settlement on condition that the woman will withdraw the case filed against the man.

https://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-10/pune/29527293_1_sessions-court-alimony-lower-court

How very sad! Thanks for sharing roshni B