Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

prabir   19 August 2018

Order 6 rule 17

correction is sought by respondent in the affidavit of written statement regarding her employment status. But now it is found that in body of the WS there are many statements which are contrary to statements given in other criminal cases, all of which she lost. What steps can be taken? Can the WS be quashed?


Learning

 2 Replies

Adv Deepak Joshi +917017821512 (Advocate)     19 August 2018

Please post complete facts.

prabir   19 August 2018

It is about a mat suit filed by husband in which wife filed a WS. Wife made a deliberate mistake while stating her 'status' in the affidavit. Then she filed a petition u/o 6 R17 for amending the same. Now the husband finds that in the body of WS, there are several deliberately made false/contradictory statements as reflected from the evidence given by her in two criminal cases. Both the criminal cases were decided against her. Now the question is since the statements of WS itself is proved wrong in other cases, can the WS be quashed and marriage disolved?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register