Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Will UPA survive in Central on Telangana issue?

Page no : 2

(Guest)

States are not named after language?

Tamil  nadu,  Gujrath, rajasthan, Bihar, West Bengal, Orissa, Assam, Manipur .

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 December 2009

 Let Telugu State be created, I shall be the first person to ask Raj Thackerey to clamour for changing the name of Maharashtra to Marathi State.

 

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 December 2009

 On 1 November 1956, the states of India were reorganized on linguistic grounds. The territories of the State of Hyderabad were divided between newly created Andhra Pradesh, Mumbai state (later Maharashtra), and Karnataka. Telugu speaking area of Hyderabad state also known as Telangana (including Hyderabad city) was merged with Telugu speaking state of Andhra state to create to Andhra Pradesh. Thus, Hyderabad became the capital city of the new state of Andhra Pradesh.

 


(Guest)

Bal and Raj Thackerey they are having there own problems with Marathi Manoos.

Telangana can use any name Telugu State or Telangana State.

But Costal Andha people after this separation they will fight among them selfs like cat and dog for there daily bread and butter.

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR)     26 December 2009

ANIL JI,

THANKS FOR YOUR COLLECTION OF DATA FROM WIKIPEDEA HISTORY PAGES, WHICH ARE MORE AUTHENTICATIVE  THAN ANY OTHER BOOKS. , HATS UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!. 

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     13 February 2010

LANGUAGE PROBLEM :


Journalist : ND Tiwari'ji, as the Hon'ble Governer of AP,  how could you indulge in such an act?

 

Tiwari :  I'm extremely sorry, mistook TELANGANA agitation for    "TEL-LAGANA" !

heeee......heeee....heee...heee..hee....hee

 

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal

Ravi Shankar (prof)     24 October 2013

Article 4 of the constitution says state  reorganization can not be construed as constitutional amendment. Article 371d.10 says, irrespective of any other section/article in the constitution, 371d stays in effect.  these two are mutually contradictory. Can any learned lawyers enlighten us regarding this issue? I mean, which provision supersedes which? Can a law with simple majority in the house set aside a constitutional amendment?

 

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register