Learned advocates,
In a civil case of mine... I happen to be the plaintiff... Issues were framed by honourable lower court..... To which we produced the necessary ORIGINAL documents along with necessary written explanations on oath...
However judge without any objection from defendant side gave the said ORIGINAL documents MARKS and not exhibits...
1) My question is can the judge do so.... Under what section??
2) Does it make any difference between Mark and Exhibit??
3) At the time of cross examination of plaintiff, can the defendant rely on the said MARKED documents??
4) At the time of final arguments can i rely on my MARKED documents??
5) what can be done to make them exhibited?
| Originally posted by : jainishlalcheta@gmail.com | ||
 |
Learned advocates, In a civil case of mine... I happen to be the plaintiff... Issues were framed by honourable lower court..... To which we produced the necessary ORIGINAL documents along with necessary written explanations on oath...However judge without any objection from defendant side gave the said ORIGINAL documents MARKS and not exhibits... 1) My question is can the judge do so.... Under what section?? 2) Does it make any difference between Mark and Exhibit?? 3) At the time of cross examination of plaintiff, can the defendant rely on the said MARKED documents?? 4) At the time of final arguments can i rely on my MARKED documents?? 5) what can be done to make them exhibited? |  |
Marked documents have no value in evidence, Exhibits are requrired to prove the case. Yes defendent can rely on marked doucments.
