Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

pun (eng)     12 October 2012

Perjury application must be decided first before proceeding

Hello Members,

I have got this attached judgement but didn't find it on court site. Did any one ever use this judgement in his/her case or if someone can tell this is valid judgement not a fake one.

Thanks.



Learning

 10 Replies

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     12 October 2012

1. It isa genuine Judgment from LKO Bench of ALD HC. 
2. You have to RTI Allahabad HC and request for true Copy from its Lucknow bench. Search RTI procedure of UP Courts and may act accordingly as it is slightly different Fees wise.
3. It is not Citated in any of the Reporters as yet inspite of being decided on 09-01-2003.

Be it so, would you agree that both parties to a marriage put atleast 15% perjury as per sum total paras of their matters in Court since it is family matter and without which process of Court cannot initiate - service further?

1 Like

pun (eng)     12 October 2012

Thanks @ Tajobsindia.

In my case she mentioned my wrong correspondence address while filing the DV case and got ex part order and in other cases which were filed later she herself has confirmed that I was out of India that time and tenants were staying in the flat. now she has filed the application for case withdrawl which not yet ordered..I want to submit the purjuiry application before judge pass the order to close the case and want to use this judgement to support my application.

pun (eng)     12 October 2012

Does anyone has the true copy of this judgement?

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     13 October 2012

As you say and allow me to quote you “she wants to withdraw cases and Judge has not ordered…”

My thinking are; why file “perjury” when she is withdrawing cases and what good you will get in appearing number of times in various Court(s) to push “perjury” when complainant is not interested to pursue her own case?

pun (eng)     13 October 2012

she has withdrawn the case just for her comfort and just don't want to allow me to meet my son..she knows that I am ready to fight the cases and my son is the only weak point which is only tool to harrass me..now she is working at my city and travelling to her parental place is hard for her also..withdrawing this case doesn't mean that she has withdrawn all the cases..she is still lodging the false police complaints..and now she has the another DV case to start which she already has filed at my city.I want this purjuiry application just to have some pressure on her also. judfge is very much interested to pass the order in her favor to withdraw the case as he also don't want to take the burden of passing the visitation order.

Please tell me what are the possibility which can work in this case.

pun (eng)     22 October 2012

Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002

Peition no is missing in the above attached judgement. does any one have the complete version?

Thanks

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     22 October 2012

Misl. Single No. 56 of 2003 (Lucknow Bench)

Also search / refer / understand then apply;

PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 25 January, 2010
BOMBAY HIGH COURT:  Dated 14 March 2011
DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated
23 March, 2009

CHENNAI HIGH COURT: Dated 26th August 2010
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT: Dated 19 January, 2010

GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 18 August, 2010
SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA: Dated 14 November, 1994
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated
15 March, 2001

-------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by : pun
  Your reply is not clear to me....the petition no is missing in the judgement attached in first post in this thread.
Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002
Misl. Single No. 56 of 2003 (Lucknow Bench)
I am asking for petition no (2002) ..Is it the same you provided (2003)?
How to search the other judgements of various HIGH courts with date only.
 

 

1. Yes it is one and the same.
2. Now help yourself to parties names as asked;

PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated
25 January, 2010
CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M)
Sunny Bhumbla Vs. Shashi


BOMBAY
HIGH COURT: Dated 14 March 2011
AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 266 OF 2007

Shriram Munjaji Raut Vs. The State of Maharashtra

DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 23 March, 2009

CRL.M.C. 1130/2008 & CRL.M.A.4231/2008
JAGDISH PRASAD Vs. STATE & ORS.

CHENNAI HIGH COURT: Dated 26th August 2010
Review Application Nos.108, 109 and 110 of 2010
S.Deepak Vs. D.Anitha

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT: Dated 19 January, 2010

Criminal Misc. Application No.30509 of 2009

Garima Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and another


GUJARAT HIGH COURT: Dated 18 August, 2010

Babubhai Vs. State


SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Dated 14 November, 1994
Chandra Shashi Vs. Anil Kumar Verma

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated
15 March, 2001
Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. Radha Arun

 

1 Like

pun (eng)     22 October 2012

 

@tajobsindia

Your reply is not clear to me....the petition no is missing in the judgement attached in first post in this thread.

Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002

Misl. Single No. 56 of 2003 (Lucknow Bench)

I am asking for petition no (2002) ..Is it the same you provided (2003)?

How to search the other judgements of various HIGH courts with date only.

pun (eng)     23 October 2012

thanks @tajobsindia.

Shantanu Wavhal (Worker)     23 November 2013

are there any more citations from bombay HC / SC ?


perjury application be decided first.

1 Like

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register