Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amit (Engineer)     05 August 2015

Whom to take no objection

In Punjab and Haryana High Court:

25/03/2013 : Anticpatory Bail case is filled by lawyer A and B

01/04/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A

20/05/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A

11/03/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and B

11/03/2014 : Discussion by lawyer B

29/09/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and C

08/12/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and C

24/02/2015 : Discussion by lawyer C

26/05/2015 : Discussion by lawyer  C

Punjab And Haryana High Court website reflects Advocate Name: Lawyer A

The AB  was cancelled. Since IO lied on record and I got evidence through RTI under section 482 I refilled for  review/recall with new advocate D. On hearing judge told that we need to take no objection from old advocate.

Please tell whom I have to take no objection:

  1. Advocate A whose name appears in High Court website as ‘Advocate name ‘
  2. Advocate A and B who both have filled the petition (Only advocate A’s name appears as advocate name in High Court website)
  3. Advocate C who last argued in the AB case


Learning

 2 Replies

Adv Rohit Dalmia 9324538481 (Lawyer)     05 August 2015

No objection is required from the Advocates who had filed the petition before the Court. Confirm whether Adv. C who appeared for arguments was a Sr. Counsel or a Counsel?

 

Hope your query is resolved.

 

 

 

 

Amit (Engineer)     05 August 2015

Thanks Rohit ji for your reply.

Advocate C is not the senior counsell.

The petition has been filled by two advocate A and B, but in High Court website, the advocate name is A only. Please tell should I take no objection from A and B or only from A.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register