Un-accounted income of complainant & mis-use of cheque

if u can prove the cheque was given as security and if you can prove the money was lent you need not worry

1) Cheque is from your account 2) You have signed it 3) it is bounced and 4) you did not pay after notice so law presumes your guilt.

It will be only an expert defense advocate who can get accused out from such cases otherwise normal cases it is conviction.

Intially signed  cheque is suffieicent to prove the transaction liability  , generally  cheque given as an security is related with commerical agreement and transaction , you iteslf admitted the issuing of  cheque to money lender . If Money lender lending money illegally ( without licenses ) he hide his lending business in legal notice and complaint also.  Negotiable Instrument Act define only "legal enforcement liability"  , but practically its tough job to prove it.   

The accused should not confuse the two issues the ILLEGAL BUSINESS AND LIABILITY.

Even though the person doing illegal money lending he can not be deprived of his dues. He may be punished for illegal work it does not mean the accused can eascape from liability. There is HIGH COURT citation on this matter.

There are other methods to win the case since the law is technical and so all rquirements are not properly followed by the complainant..But over dependence on such defense results in conviction .

Mr Maru, 

Pl refer me that particular citation of High Court where that court allowed and helped to recover a illegally lended money .

Mr Hemant agrawal a  well studied member of this had posted that JUDGEMENT on this site, pl search it.

I will also  do it  but it may take time.