Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Harassed NRI (Harassed NRI )     04 August 2018

Third party email evidence

My uncle is fighting his FALSE 498a case in lower court in Gujarat , India. Case is in hearing stage, witnesses being crossed by my uncle’s lawyer. Public Prosecutor and Judge has no objection in submitting email or electronic evidence without certificate under 65B as both the parties agreed mutually to submit and allow  it.

When my uncle produced email communication evidence between “MY Father” and “MY FATHER- IN- LAW”, PP  objected and Judge supported  it saying it is not allowed as it being third party communication. My uncle’s lawyer has argued and said to take matter to High Court. Judge requested 2 weeks’ time to decide on that.  My entire family also implicated in false 498a in India but  being NRI, is not in India and so unable to attend  court proceedings and cannot be present. I believe evidences are evidences.

Please help me with your expert advise on this matter . I will appreciate any reference to past such ruling , please.



Learning

 1 Replies

DR RAVINDRA CHAUHAN   04 August 2018

PLZ SEE Section 113b OF Indian evidence act

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register