Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     27 December 2009

Removal of Dinakaran importasnt or lawyers Conniving Importa

The issue of removing Dinakaran is important or Advocates Conniving with corruption in Judiciary is Important? Where are we today?



Learning

 11 Replies


(Guest)

Keeping Chief Justice Dinakaran is more important than removing from Judiciary.

Once he is removed no one will beleaves the Judiciary Department.

Corruption in Judiciary is comming from ages and no one can stop these corrupt officials in India.

 

RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA)     27 December 2009

Keeping Chief Justice Dinakaran is more important than removing from Judiciary.

We should change the mental status of the CHIEF JUSTICE DINA KARAN .

niranjan (civil practice)     27 December 2009

Dinakaran should be persuaded by the Govt. to get retirement,to uphold the prestige of judiciary.


(Guest)

Finally Justice Dinakaran is going to be taken care by panel of Judges only.

Congress never do this mistake. Although some group of MPs do some drama in Parliment. Collecting papers and signing papers. Just for sake of propaganda.

 


(Guest)

UPA Government orders Justice Dinakaran for compulsory retirement. Then no dispute arises.

Ramakrishnaraju (Asst.)     28 December 2009

He is openly criticising the Collector's fact finding report  and what ever coming out against him is nonsense and he alone is straightforward.  If he continues with this jaundiced ice, how can he jduge the case?.  He should be impeached like Ramaswamy or let him take VRS to save the judiciary.

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     29 December 2009

Removal of Justice Dinakaran is important if he is guilty.

RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA)     31 December 2009

if removal of justice Dinakaran is important if he is guilty ,then kindly go throughthe content the contempt pitition no.203of 1996 (s.c.), these can be had from supreme court only .it is your luck that will get it & take a decision.......................

R.K.SUNDERRAJ (LAWYER HUBLI,KARNATAKA)     31 December 2009

Our's is a democratic country,where rule of law,Right of being hered, is even given to a common man to address his views, The Hon'ble Justice has to be given a chance to express their views, Just by mere publicity in the papers we cannot arrive at the conclusion that Justice is guilty.

I hope that Justice Dinakaran is a ver experienced  person,even if we go through his carrier record as an advocate,he is very experienced lawyer and has come accrose various laws and complicated cases and constitutional cases etc.etc.

If at all the Justice would have been guilty, who is not a layman,knows every preposition of law he himself would have stepped down.

But here if we carefully analyse the situation as reported in the press and the defence of the Justice, it is clear that the property which is in dispuite was said to have purchased prior to his joining as a judicial officer.

Now the question is WHEATHER BECOMING A JUDGE IS A SIN... in itself...? 

Every thing will come out black and white........ we have to wait and see... we shall not comment anything until and unless the result comes out after enquiry.

I feel Impeachement is not required.


(Guest)

Yes sir, you are 100% correct.

He is Master of all. Nothing will happen to Justice Dinakaran.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     04 February 2010

 If Judge Dinakaran is removed, life will become drab. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register