MADURAI LAWYER (LEGAL CONSULTANT) 02 November 2011

Judicial officers indifferent to injustice are anti-national

AN OPEN LETTER TO JUSTICE K. CHANDRU, MADRAS HIGH COURT AT MADURAI BENCH.

"Even Judicial Officers who are indifferent to injustice done the common man are anti-national. It is a painful thing to observe that the very Madras High Court is second to none in accommodating and tolerating those officers who are very much indifferent to injustice".

S.JEEVAGAN, M.A.,LL.M.

MADURAI-625020.

01/11/2011.

The Hon'ble Justice K. Chandru

The High Court of Madras at Madurai Bench,

MADURAI, TAMILNADU.

Ref: The Hindu ( Madurai) dt.30/10/2011,

News Item: Indulging in corruption is also anti-national: HC

Madras High Court is second to none in accommodating judicial officers who are indifferent to injustice done to the common man and tolerating unlawful activities of the police as well as judicial officers. However, it is unfortunate that the misbehaviour or indifferent attitude of of the judicial officers cannot be easily proved thanks to the fear of contempt proceedings in the minds of law-abiding citizens.

The High Court may kindly realize a fact that the victims cannot easily secure justice through legal means in the diluted justice delivery system of India unless they are more influential than the offenders or wrong-doers.

The MADURAI BENCH OF THE MADRAS HIGH COURT should consider not only the fate of the litigants who can approach the Courts of law for legal remedies, but also that of those who are afraid of dire consequences at the instance of cunning politicians, corrupt police personnel, dishonest judicial officers and merciless rowdies in the event of their seeking justice through legal means.

If Public Referendum is ordered to be held on the issue of working of Indian Justice Delivery System, it will surely reflect the dissatisfaction of the people over the diluted justice delivery system of India. In absence of the Public Referendum, INJUSTICE DONE TO THE COMMON MAN WILL CONTINUE THANKS TO THE ANTI-NATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS.

https://www.jeevaganadvocate.com/injustice.php

--
WITH BEST REGARDS,

S.JEEVAGAN, M.A., LL.M.,
Advocate & Legal Consultant,
Karuppayurani, MADURAI-20.

Cell No. 9842197857 / 9842816527.

Reply Follow

4 Replies

madhu mittal (director) 05 November 2011

Sir,

Many a times, at the time of arguments, written arguments are submitted and a number of citations with paragraph of those citations are also written, but the presiding officer rarely pay attention towards those citations and do not want to do full justice by referering them. How to tackle this type of situations. Take example of Cheque retd case u/s 138, a case is lasted for about five years only and only delay tactics of accused, and at the last moment at the time of decision, he submits a banker cheque equal to the amount of face value of cheque. The victim/complainant shows a number of citations that in a case of cheque interest is mandatory @ 18 p.a. u/s 80 NI Act. But the presiding officer only let the accused free saying he is ready to pay the amount of cheque, he even after conviction, let free on probation or sentence till rising of the court or like fleebite sentence and making mockery of justice in the grab of discretionary power regarding sentence where as it was also shown to presiding officer that discretionary power is also subject to judicial guidance. I want to know in addition to go in revision to higher court, Is there any forum where a complaint against presiding officer can be made for not paying attention towards the citation decided by even supreme court or other high courts.