Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     19 November 2009

FM likely to drop the proposal to tax religious trusts

The finance ministry is likely to drop the proposal to tax religious trusts. The proposal formed part of the direct taxes code and had raised eyebrows both within and outside the finance ministry.  “The issue has been raised in the finance ministry’s internal discussions. We are discussing whether the exemption was removed with intent or by mistake,” said a finance ministry official.

Under Section 10 (23C) of the Income Tax Act, any trust or institution that works wholly for public religious and charitable purposes and is approved by the chief commissioner or director general, is tax exempt. The tax code, however, has removed the term “religious purpose” from the exemption eligibility and instead said income of only those bodies that are registered under any Act of the Centre or the state and administer religious trusts, endowments or societies will be exempt.

Taxation experts have also opposed the proposal. “In the existing system, all religious monuments registered with the commissioner of income tax get exemption, provided they are able to spend 85 per cent of the funds for religious purposes. In the direct taxes code, only government institutions such as the Wakf Board controlling religious trust are exempt,” said Girish Ahuja, a chartered accountant.

In the same way, the income of authorities managing religious shrines such as Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Vaishno Devi would be fully exempt from tax under the direct taxes code since they are established under a government Act.

“Currently, institutions can be registered with the tax department to claim deduction. Under the new code, they can register only with the Centre or the state government to claim deduction. But this could be a problem since only three states have provision for registration — Maharashtra, Gujarat and Orissa,” said Hitesh Gajaria, partner, KPMG.

Moreover, Section 80G of the existing Income Tax Act gives 50 per cent exemption on donations made to religious trusts.

The new code has proposed such exemption only for renovation or repair of a temple, mosque, gurdwara, church or other place that has been notified in the official gazette to be of historic, archaeological or artistic importance or a place of public worship of renown throughout any state or states.

Experts said this proposal in the code would significantly reduce donations since any contribution meant for spending on religious activities of a shrine such as bhajans and kirtans, or charitable activity, like feeding or teaching the poor, would be fully taxed.

Religious places that will be eligible for tax exemptions on donations will be notified later. “Any religious monument may not qualify to be of artistic or historic importance.

This will impact donations in a country where religion takes precedence over lots of issues,” said Prashant Khatore, partner, Ernst & Young.

Ahuja agreed, “Religious trusts are not taxed in most countries because they receive donations from the people. The authorities must have forgotten to put themin the exemption list.”



Learning

 5 Replies


(Guest)

Tax should impose on religious trusts without any excuse. In the name of religious trusts people are cheating and accumlating huge amounts without maintaining proper accounts. If a person donates to a religious trust let him donate and provide tax exemption. IT has to inquire about donor and religious trust.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     20 November 2009

 What about political parties and donations to politicians? Mayawati says her wealth has gone beyond hundreds of crores because workers of her political parties go without food, clothing and shelter but sell their houses to donate everything on her birthday out of "love and affection" because she has brougt transformation in their life.

Political parties are mushrooming because "donations" received by them are neither audited nor taxed. A man of two tuppence, a daily wage worker in a coal mine, a tea vendor, a small time street urchin have become multi-millionaires and we can't do a thing because politicians have made the laws that protect them and HC and SC look silently saying the law does not permit them to inquire into their wealth.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     20 November 2009

 John Mathias and C.D. Deshmukh were not politicians but very good FM. Now bureaucrats are leading the ministers through their nose. 

Do these ministers remain in Delhi to do their work? Obviously, not. They would not have spent 300 crores between 2004-09 on travels alone. They go to their constituencies. Is India not their constituencies. Their main job is foundation stone laying ceremony, attending weddings and funerals of relations and friends, inauguration of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals. Where do they have time to attend to official work. Files are filing from the floor to the ceiling.


(Guest)

sorry I forgot writeabout political parties funds. Where ever donations are involved those organizations should impose tax without any excuse be it a religious trust or wakf  or political parties should not spare.

Vineet (Director)     20 November 2009

I agree with all learned contributors of this forum.

 

The provisions applicable for religious, charitable trusts have beed abused indiscrimnately and should be controlled. In fact there should not be any deduction allowable for donations to religious trusts and political parties. Let the donations to them be out of volition and not for any tax consideration.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register