thank you for your replies but this is not exparte order. i filed 498a acquittal order that has points in favor me and points agains the lower court, police and the witnesses and i filed this judgemnet as exhibit. also, there was no income document on record in the evidence. they say 3lakhs after all deductions and i say 40000 after all deductions. she admited she worked beofre marriage and during litigation but denied the current job. although there are seveal supreme court judgments abuot working & qualified lady not eligible for mainetence.
why did the DVC court ignore these facts?
1. when 498a itself is acquital, where is DVC
2. when there is no DV, why maintenance
3. when wife admitted herpast working and qualification, why huge maintenance
are not these grounds considered in the next sessions court?
i am hiring a senior advocate for revisiion petition and he also got shocked to hear when i told him about huge maintenance. he clearly mentioned this is extra ordinary amount without any income proof and told this will be collapsed when argued in sessions?
is he right in saying?
i am also awaiting for judgement to come to check on what basis this huge scneario. as told youso many time, the OP lawyer is a senior influential lawyer and his relatives are also magistration in one city or other. like he bribed 498a judge last year for conviciting us, the same he did with DVC judge to get huge maintenance in the girl's favor.