Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Romal Vakode   24 September 2015

Advise on criminal matter required - pl. help

Dear Experts,

Here in the instance case, there were total 4 accused (self amongst them) , not yet convicted by the session Court , and were

erstwhile  in 1998 released on bail alleged u/s 114, 363 ,511 – IPC, since 1997. Out of 4, 2 of them were expired in 2004 &

2007 respectively. However the offence of kidnaping was not actually happened, but yes there was an attempt. Based on the

complaint of the Parents of the then minor girl, police had arrested all the accused and later produced before the Magistrate

and the bail was granted.

 

My queries: -

1. Is it advisable to go for 482 quashing it before the HC, or a request before the same trail court for speedy trial?

 

2. Since 18 years have passed, no one from the complainants side have appeared till date, will this ground stand strong enough for dismissal for want of prosecution (DWOP). The (Complainant) father of the girl has retired and is keeping extremely ill, the girl now is married and is residing in other state.

 

3. Request all Experts to cite any judgements of Hon’ble SC / HC’s and or any provisions available under CrPC, wherein I get the way out to come out of this.

 

Thanking you in anticipation.

 

Regards/Romal Vakode.



Learning

 2 Replies

SAINATH DEVALLA (LEGAL CONSULTANT)     24 September 2015

Citing the reasons file a memo in the trial court for speedy trial,quashing is of no use at this stage.

advocatepassy@gmail.com 971794 (Advocate)     25 September 2015

It's a criminal case and non appearance by girl or her relatives do not make a difference because PP is the lawyer from the State against you. Request for speedy trial in the. Lower court.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register