Subramani
18 April 2010 at 14:02
Mine is a proprietorship firm. I have supplied chemicals to a pvt. ltd. firm during the year 2004-05 and 05-06. As the said company defaulted in payment, I stopped supplying chemicals from April 2006. The outstanding at that time was around Rs 7.5lakhs. The company paid back around Rs 2.5lakhs in bits and parts thereafter till november2009 and then stopped paying completely.
I have sent them a notice through an advocate but they replied back denying the allegation. I now intend to go to court but I have lost most of the supply challans which is the proof of delivery. The only proof would be their balance sheet. I am sure my outstanding must be reflecting in their balance sheet. Please let me know how should i proceed further and whether i should file the case against them. Thanks
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 13:50
Mine is a proprietorship firm. I have supplied chemicals to a pvt. ltd. firm during the year 2004-05 and 05-06. As the said company defaulted in payment, I stopped supplying chemicals from April 2006. The outstanding at that time was around Rs 7.5lakhs. The company paid back around Rs 2.5lakhs in bits and parts thereafter till november2009 and then stopped paying completely.
I have sent them a notice through an advocate but they replied back denying the allegation. I now intend to go to court but I have lost most of the supply challans which is the proof of delivery. The only proof would be their balance sheet. I am sure my outstanding must be reflecting in their balance sheet. Please let me know whether i should file the case against them. Thanks
Member Strength 9,47,424 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
FSI of one building out of six buildings
Ours is a co operative housing society in Mumbai. Society has 6 buildings (94 flats).Now one of the building with 16 flats has formed a FSI committee and going ahead with the construction of additional FSI granted by govt. Two of the members of this building have given a written letter to the society that they are not willing to take part in the additional FSI and therefore have not contributed monetarily.
Now one of the non participating member wants to sell of his flat and the FSI committee is insisting on the managing committee not to give NOC to the member without the FSI committee's NOC as the FSI committee feels that the non participating members are also bound to share the cost incurred towards common column. Please advice whether FSI committee has the right to ask the managing committee to consult them before giving NOC to the member.