avinash jos
21 February 2010 at 07:30
Mr. A on regular service of the ORNANACE FACTORIES of India, Central Govt employee, was suspended on 12th June 2006 and the suspension was revoked on 27th July 2006 i.e 45 days both dates included.
Punishment : When due the next three increments to be stopped with commulative effect
Question in Law: Increment happened in every year in the month of july,2006
(1) Mr. A was in the suspension period when the increment was due in 2006, therefore there have been no increments in 2006,2007,2008,2009
(2) Is Mr. A eigible for the 6 Central Pay Comission benefit which has the important clause " 6 pay comission benefit of one increment will be given if only regular employment from Jan-july of 2006, however here Mr. A was suspended from June 12th '2006 to July 27th'2006, is the suspension period amount to the service regarded as regular sservice.
avinash jos
12 February 2010 at 14:28
If A and B husband and wife are both retired central govt pensioners and both are deceseased as on Aug 2007 and are survived by 4 daughters and 1 son, all of whom are married and of the 4 daughters 3 are widowed lets call them 'c' 'd' and 'e'. c is in grant of pension for her husband at the rate of 330/- per month and , 'd' is getting family pension for her deceased husband who was a central govt., 'e' is currently working for MP govt hospital, In this case is " c" eligible for central govt pension under the head widowed daughter? Also will "c" be required a Succession Certificate for the grant of such family pension? The fact to be noted here is that the landed property of A& B have been given to all the children through a registered will and the Name transfer for the same has been done by the Court of the Tehsildar.
Question of Law: Is succession certificate required for "c" {(widowed daughter) getting paid family pension of 330/- per month of her deceased husband 'z'} for the deceased central govt parents? Please advice
Member Strength 9,46,333 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Promotion Releated
Mr. Z got recruited on 22.10.1980 as an Industrial Employee(IE) of Ordnanace Factories of India, central Govt employee, from 1980 to 1985 Mr. Z worked in the capacity of the Industrial Worker and then appeared for a Departmental test for LDC (Non Industrial Employee- NIE) in the year 1985 and the Results were declared in the year 1985 and the selection list was created in 1985, and Mr. Z started working on this role effective March 1991.
(a)During this period of 1985-1991 after such results were declared the appointments to the post of the LDC were kept on HOLD internally saying that there were no positions available for the same, However during the same period for similar post of LDC compassionate and open hiring at this specific factory location was made from outside as fresh recruitments. Does a suit lie?
(b) As on date the direct hires from outside during this period of 1985 till 1991 who have been hired after the declaration of the LDC result of internal candidates and whose promotions were on HOLD for want of positions, hence the direct hires currently are seniors to the internal hires on this position. Do a suit lie for seniority of internal candidates and also for the financila loss effected due to this hold of position for 7 years both 1985-1991 included.