mahendrakumar
12 March 2017 at 14:58
is it necessary to give a legal notice under cpc80,before filing a contempt petition against govt of india,for not implementing an order/judgment of SC.
or we can straight away file the contempt.In a judgment of pension matters of exserviceman,the court ordered the implementation with in 90 days. The period of 90 days is over as on 31 jan 2017.
Anonymous
09 March 2017 at 07:54
Hello sir, my name is SHEIK FAZIL , I was studying in government college as a BBA student. My father name is HUSSAIN, in my father documents like AADHAR CARD, PAN CARD,ETC., his name should be HUSSAIN only, but in my TC & Birth Certificate my father name is MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, So now want to change father name in my TC & Birth Certificate. My Father all the document has as a HUSSAIN name only , but from my childhood the name of my father is mentioned MOHAMMED HUSSAIN now i want change into HUSSAIN. SO i want help to change my father name in my all document's..
Dhiraj Kumar Sharma
17 September 2016 at 23:08
Sir,
I m dhiraj Kumar Sharma from jharkhand.sir I m faces very big problem in my name spelling mistakes in 10th certificates .my 10th name is DHEERAJ but 12th and degree certificate name is DHIRAJ . This mistake is stopping me in my jobs.
Sir how to remove this problem.
Thanks
mahendrakumar
30 July 2016 at 07:58
based on a sc judgment on rounding of service so as to make a person eligible for service pension,a similarly placed person,requested the same central govt,ie,indian Navy for granting him too the pension.however,Navy has rejected his claim stating that,the sc judgment is applicable only to that person,who secured the judgment. Now what are the options.
1) can he approach the HC of his jurisdiction quoting the sc judgment,for pension
2) should he also approach the sc,stating that,he is also similarly placed,same dept and same period of service?
the person is at present ,71 years old and met me as a social worker for guidance.
expecting some guidance from experts on the above,including any other easy/speedy solution
mahendrakumar
02 September 2015 at 06:34
an individual joined indian Navy in 1974,signing an enrollment form with the following conditions.
"I xxxxxx understand and accept the teerms and conditions of service in the Navy and I do hereby agreet to serv e honestly and faithfully in the Indian Navy for the term of 10 years from 01 feb 1974 provided my service should be so long required and thereafter for a further period of of 10 years in fleet reserve,if required,"
Now the persion has completed 10 years active service on 31st jan 1984. He was not told at that time,whether he was kept for reserve service for a further period of 10 years from 01 feb 1984.
during 1976,GOI,issued an order stating that,the practice of drafting sailors to reservists have been stopped with effect from 03 jul 1976,however,all those existing reservists till date would be paid the benefits. The sailor was discharged on completion of 10 years on 01 feb 1984.
the sailor's reservist pension claim was denied by the Navy on two grounds.
1. as per his original terms of engagement,his continuation in reservists,is only "if required". since the govt doesnot required you in 1984,you are not entitled for the benefits.
a) can such terms "if required" be a part of an engagement in service agreements with govt,legally valid?
b)in the instant case,the sailor completed his intial terms of agreement on 01 feb 1984,much after the govt stopped the reser vists system and benefits in 1976.however,the sailor was not intimated in 1976,whilst in service or on 01 feb 1984,while on discharge,that,he is not on reservists anymore. The govt order in 1976 says eventhough the system of rtransferring sailors to reservists stopped,all the existing reservists,need not be transferred to reservists,however would be paid the benefits,till they are wasted out.
kindly advise on the above,regarding the legal position of the said ex sailors claim on reservists benefits.
mahendrakumar
05 October 2014 at 18:43
in a case between union of india and other,the Govt has filed an SLP before SC and the court admitted it with notice to respondents. Now what will be the normal procedures,in simple steps like 1) notice to the respondents 2) respondents file counter along with written argument notes etc like in any other court of law or some more different steps involved?
request exports to give a brief on the normal or likely steps involved?
nandhini
16 August 2014 at 08:23
hi....in gazatte itself having original name
need to change in birth certificate alone....if i want to get the copy of gazatte what i have to do........
Jyothi suresh
15 August 2014 at 22:50
My husband met with accident 2 weeks back he dies after 2 days. I reported a case on nearby police station. Police took legal action and took both vehicles and released it after 1 week. Please let me know what' law says.
AMSARAJ.J
15 August 2014 at 11:57
Dear Sirs,
I want to get information about my wife employement,salary details from the office,she is working (Panchayat Union Office) under RTI Act on line.
Since,DV act case on me is pending,I need this details. How to draft a requestion letter and how to apply for this online.
Pls help me in this regard.
Thanking You,
Amsaraj
Member Strength 9,47,764 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Time limits for clarification petition at sc
is there a time limit for filing a clarification petition at supreme court against its judgment,like for filing review petitions.
if so, what is the normal time limits?
is it necessary to file a clarification first to the registry?
since the judgment is around 50 pages and confusing one,I am not giving details of the judgment. As such request,not to treat this query as a general one
Thanks