Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

mayilsamy n   29 September 2011 at 18:50

Consent order for public drainage

Should local bodies obtain consent order from the pollution control board under section 25 of The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, to construct / alter and operate a public drainage system ?

mayilsamy n   23 April 2011 at 18:51

drainage water is running into the our land

The municipality is increasing the capacity of the existing drainage (open drainage system) mean while due rain , all the drainage water has entered into our land. actually we do use the drainage as we have enough agriculture land to take care of our waste water..


it's seem municipality is not interested in act fast...


how proceed with this problem,

mayilsamy n   15 April 2011 at 22:04

election - sec 49(O) of conduct of election rules, 1961

" 49-O. Elector deciding not to vote.-If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark. "

In the recently concluded state election i have decide to opt for 49-O, The funnest part was that the presiding office was searching for 49-O for about 10 minute (actually there is no such a form for 49(0)), It shows how the election commission has educated/trained the presiding officers.

My question is can i challenge this rule under art 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of India.

Point 1 - art.14, 19
Why is that i have disclose my choice to election staff and record in writing on a public record (that is register as per sec 17A maintained by a election commission) while those who vote are also making a choice, is maintained as secret or their choice remain unknown. why a person who is making an effort to get to the election / voting booth unlike other who totally restrain from voting and decide to reject all the candidate is been singled out or been treated differently. The rule is like you are forced to make a choice among the candidates or get your identity revealed, is it against art 19 also were the law indirectly compels / force you to make a choice.

can we challenge the sec 49(0) under article 14 - Right to equality, is it a justified classification, classification where one who rejects all candidate is treated differently compare to those who make a choice of a single candidate?

Point 2. art -21,
The worst part is that when i am excising 49(0), i will not be using the voting machine which can be noted by all the booth agent of the election candidate. can i challenge this under art 21 where my right to privacy is lost in this case.

Thanks in advance for the reply...