ghansham das
18 October 2009 at 14:57
DEAR ALL,
THERE IS QUESTION BY MR RAVI, 17 OCT,09.
FORM 32 SUBMITTED , GIVES RELIEF?
MY QUERRY-
*IS IT REASONABLE FOR COMPLAINANT TO KNOW BEFORE FILLING COMPLAINANT AGAINST THE CHAIR PERSON PRESENT ON CHAIR/ ?
*WHEN ROC WILL NOT REPLY WITH IN TWO WEEKS OF TIMES AS REQUIRED TO FILE CASE U/S 138 AFTER NOTICE IS SERVICED,?
*IS THE COURTS JUDGMENTS DRAW A LINE THAT CHAIRMAN/ DIRECTORS, BOARDS ARE NOT GUILTY?
IS THAT COURT IS NOT ABLE TO JUSTIFY THAT THE BENEFICIARY IS BELIVED TO HV FAITH IN SYSTEM, JUSTICE, NOT LINGERING PROCESS ENDLESSLY???
PLS CRALIFY..???
after going hro' jc scc it is felt that the court is merely passing some orders with out keeping in view that how the complainnat is suffering for justice, is over looked, after years after years, what the use of it, if the same money is paid after ten-twenty years????
gdgupta10@rediffmail.com
ghansham das
25 September 2009 at 21:43
Dear Sir,
Can it pls be reply-
A deemed registred Ltd, company collects the a deposit/advances, remained attahced with its principal company which is public-listed one in BSE/NSE/etc: ok.
Now after taking money, appointing agancy workings,start harrasnments, diladalla, & issues payments for admitted liability, which is made to stop -dishonestly,?
[ 138 case filed, in 32/35 days,]
Also fails to refunds the dues,claims, etc, but
sells out its shares,rights,etc to third party.
What are the steps under which such section- rule- acts etc are in existance, to curbed and controll & making awareness to Public too,can be adopted.
which are different courts are to be approached, compalint to be sent, where, how, with along with Police stn if so, pls guide.
thanks
janaki raman
Member Strength 9,47,757 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
IPC 420- Beach Of Trust, etc
Can case be made out For Breach Of trust,420, etc, in NI Act 138,
when cheque intensionally is made to dishonour against the admitted liability, And non refunds of deposits [in 100 Lacs] collected, which is taken @ interest is paid also .??
And Company is sold to next third party creating his rights.
How long a High court case interviene in for accused u/s 482 for Just Quashing?
what is the time limits for High court to give justice?
Court, judiciary system can not / should not take for granted time in his alone favour.?
Where there is challange of issue of orders are applied?
Will some one as expert will guide?