Rakesh Kumar
04 July 2016 at 14:09
After dismissal of a private complaint from Hona'ble trial court and Punjab and haryana high court at the stage of summoning a criminal SLP had filed in Hon'ble Supreme Court. The same court issued notice to the respondents and on a day when I was absent in the court due to application of adjournment at my risk passed the final judgement i.e,
"Heard
No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s),if any,stands disposed of". Secondly, in the impugned order,(that was challenged in the Hon'ble Supreme Court) of Hon'ble High court a option was left that "at the most the accused persons are liable to be proceeded against departmentally".
Now my question is
1.Whether the judgement of the Hon'ble High court still stand by so that I will go for the departmental enquiry against the respondents as directed by Hon'ble High court.
2. If yes and if departmental enquiry proceeded legally wrong,biased then how can I challenge the said departmental enquiry into the court of law especially when the doors of the all courts shut down for me already in the present case?
Rakesh Kumar
27 June 2016 at 14:35
Respected Sir, Defence counsel wants a departmental inquiry in a govt. department in a case of cheating and forgery under CRL. SLP in sc after notice to escape from back door by hook and Crook methods and by a excuse that this is purely a departmental matter. Now I want prosecution over them, so I want a striking point or some applicable authority to prevent them. Weather a inquiry officer has power to summon the witness from other independent separate govt. institution for the evidence? Because in present case three witnesses are completely private with their evidential substance and one witness is from other government institution with his considerable evidence and without above said four witnesses case could not be proved. So please help me immediately-09050088688 thank you.
Rakesh Kumar
16 June 2016 at 21:09
regarding to a criminal SLP in the supreme court after receiving reply from the respondents on the notice issued by the hon'ble court-petitioner can file application seeking permission to submit additional ground. What are the drawbacks,advantages and conditions of said application.
When the evidences to prove the additional ground present in the petition file but instead of description of ground is not mentioned in the petition itself . then there is need to file said application?
Rakesh Kumar
16 May 2016 at 12:50
Can I submit written argument in a criminal special leave petition of 2014 after receiving reply by way of affidavit from the respondents. If yes,then please tell me under which law/rule time being in force to do above?
Anonymous
16 May 2016 at 12:32
Can I submit written argument in a criminal special leave petition of 2014 after receiving reply by way of affidavit from the respondents. If yes,then please tell me under which law/rule time being in force to do above?
Member Strength 9,47,444 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
review petition against judgement of SC in crl. SLP.
Please sugest me the reguired format of above said petition and all documents and titles which are necesary to file review petition in S.C.