bbratnam
19 May 2014 at 19:32
* I made an application to Mandal Development Office for some Information under the Right To Information Act 2005. The Public Information Officer not provided the asked information yet. The time period for providing the information has over as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005.
*. I used the payment mode as the Court Fee Stamp by affixing on the application.(Court Fee stamps are allowed as the fee for RTI Act in our State, Andhrapradesh). Now the Questions are,
Q1. In this case Can I Considered as a Consumer as per the Consumer Act?
Q2 Can I filed the Complaint at our District Consumer Forum?
Q3. What is the Procedure for Filing the Complaint at Consumer Forum? i.e Through Advocate or by Personal?
Q4. What about the fee to be paid to the forum?
bbratnam
16 May 2014 at 18:43
1. Is There any Difference between B.L and LLB?
2. Which one of the above allows to practice as an Attorney?
3. Please let me know the eligibility to practice at High-Court?
4. Does B.L and LLB courses varies for every state?
4. I Had completed my Graduation in B.Tech (Information Technology).
- Am I Suitable to do the Law Course?
bbratnam
15 May 2014 at 23:57
1. The Marriage of a woman was performed legally with a Constable of Border Security Force with out any dowry. Immediately after the marriage the marriage was consummated. Both are Belonging to the same village.
2. After Some days the Accused and their family members are starts physical and mental harassment. Immediately she complained the same matter at the nearest police station with the help of her parents. Then the police registered it as U/s 498(A) of I.P.C and 3 & 4 R/w 7(1)(b) of Dowry Prohibition Act.
-- After some days The Accused was Arrested and enlarged on bail.
2. Due to the Above situations the woman was living separately with her Parents.
3. In this period, when she went for answer the calls of nature to the outskirts of their village. Then her husband come to her back side and committed rape forcibly without her consent. Also he said that his parental uncle instigated him to kill his wife, because she complained on them regarding the Dowry harassment.
4. Then she escaped from him and again complain about this issue at the same police station with the help of her parents.
-- This also registered U/s 376(A), 324, 506 and 109 of I.P.C by the Police.
5. The Police send her to the District Hospital for the purpose of treatment.
-- Intentionally delayed in this case. After the delay of many days the police applied for legal opinion of the Sr. Asst. Public Prosecutor . And Basing upon the legal opinion obtained from the Sr. APP the police deleted the Sections 376 (A) of I.P.C and 109 of I.P.C from this case.
The Legal Opinion Obtained by the Police from Sr. Assistant Public Prosecutor is as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL OPINION ------------------------------------------------------------
Perused the C.D. file in Cr.No 37/10 of the XXXXXX P.S and request letter for giving Opinion.
As per the facts of the case on 24-05-2010 the complainant Smt. XXXXXX presented report to the police stating that she filed the criminal case in Cr.No. 17/2010 U/s 498(A) of I.P.C against her husband Sri. XXXXXX and there after the complainant is living with her parents house at XXXXX village and that on 24-05-10 in between at 7:30 and 8:00 A.M complainant went to answer the calls of nature and at that time accused (Sri. XXXXXX) no other than her husband has committed Rape on her and beat her and threatened her with dire consequences, basing on which a case in Cr.No 37/2010 was registered for the Offences U/s 376(A), 324, 506 and 109 of I.P.C.
The Investigation discloses that the complainant was filed the Criminal case against husband for the offence U/s 498(A) of I.P.C and Dowry Prohibition Act.
However there is no decree of separation in between the husband and wife (Complainant and accused) or any custom or usage of separation in the absence of the above, offence U/s 376(A) of I.P.C is not made out. The other offences are maintainable.
As per the above, I am of the opinion that the Provision U/s 376(A) of I.P.C is not applicable in this case.
Sr. Asst. Public Prosecutor,
(Admn.), Guntur
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The Trail also runs with out those sections, and the announced judgement was favorable to the accused.
Hence the Questions are as follows,
Q1. Is 376(A) of I.P.C is not Applicable when there is no decree of separation between Husband and Wife?
Q2. What section is Applicable when there is no decree of Separation between Husband and Wife if in case the Husband Forcibly commits the Rape against the consent of wife?
Q3. In the Above Explained case what section has to be filed? Why the police Deleted the Section 376(A) of I.P.C .
Q4. After Announcing the judgement without those sections in the lower court, where to approach for the justice.?
Q5. Can I filed this issue at LOKAYUKTA, NHRC?
Q6. In this regard Please help us where to approach for the justice?
bbratnam
15 May 2014 at 23:53
1. The Marriage of a woman was performed legally with a Constable of Border Security Force with out any dowry. Immediately after the marriage the marriage was consummated. Both are Belonging to the same village.
2. After Some days the Accused and their family members are starts physical and mental harassment. Immediately she complained the same matter at the nearest police station with the help of her parents. Then the police registered it as U/s 498(A) of I.P.C and 3 & 4 R/w 7(1)(b) of Dowry Prohibition Act.
-- After some days The Accused was Arrested and enlarged on bail.
2. Due to the Above situations the woman was living separately with her Parents.
3. In this period, when she went for answer the calls of nature to the outskirts of their village. Then her husband come to her back side and committed rape forcibly without her consent. Also he said that his parental uncle instigated him to kill his wife, because she complained on them regarding the Dowry harassment.
4. Then she escaped from him and again complain about this issue at the same police station with the help of her parents.
-- This also registered U/s 376(A), 324, 506 and 109 of I.P.C by the Police.
5. The Police send her to the District Hospital for the purpose of treatment.
-- Intentionally delayed in this case. After the delay of many days the police applied for legal opinion of the Sr. Asst. Public Prosecutor . And Basing upon the legal opinion obtained from the Sr. APP the police deleted the Sections 376 (A) of I.P.C and 109 of I.P.C from this case.
The Legal Opinion Obtained by the Police from Sr. Assistant Public Prosecutor is as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL OPINION ------------------------------------------------------------
Perused the C.D. file in Cr.No 37/10 of the XXXXXX P.S and request letter for giving Opinion.
As per the facts of the case on 24-05-2010 the complainant Smt. XXXXXX presented report to the police stating that she filed the criminal case in Cr.No. 17/2010 U/s 498(A) of I.P.C against her husband Sri. XXXXXX and there after the complainant is living with her parents house at XXXXX village and that on 24-05-10 in between at 7:30 and 8:00 A.M complainant went to answer the calls of nature and at that time accused (Sri. XXXXXX) no other than her husband has committed Rape on her and beat her and threatened her with dire consequences, basing on which a case in Cr.No 37/2010 was registered for the Offences U/s 376(A), 324, 506 and 109 of I.P.C.
The Investigation discloses that the complainant was filed the Criminal case against husband for the offence U/s 498(A) of I.P.C and Dowry Prohibition Act.
However there is no decree of separation in between the husband and wife (Complainant and accused) or any custom or usage of separation in the absence of the above, offence U/s 376(A) of I.P.C is not made out. The other offences are maintainable.
As per the above, I am of the opinion that the Provision U/s 376(A) of I.P.C is not applicable in this case.
Sr. Asst. Public Prosecutor,
(Admn.), Guntur
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The Trail also runs with out those sections, and the announced judgement was favorable to the accused.
Hence the Questions are as follows,
Q1. Is 376(A) of I.P.C is not Applicable when there is no decree of separation between Husband and Wife?
Q2. What section is Applicable when there is no decree of Separation between Husband and Wife if in case the Husband Forcibly commits the Rape against the consent of wife?
Q3. In the Above Explained case what section has to be filed? Why the police Deleted the Section 376(A) of I.P.C .
Q4. After Announcing the judgement without those sections in the lower court, where to approach for the justice.?
Q5. Can I filed this issue at LOKAYUKTA, NHRC?
Q6. In this regard Please help us where to approach for the justice?
bbratnam
15 May 2014 at 23:51
Is There any Time Limit for appealing the judgement of a lower court in a criminal Case? if the 30 day limit has passed, is there any chance for further appeals ?
Member Strength 9,46,517 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Not allowing students into class.
Please give solution to the following problem [Pondicherry Central University] .
A Lecturer is is not allowing 36 students to his classes as they failed one of his subject in the previous semester.
They requested him a lot, there is no use even they brought the same issue to the notice of the HOD.
All they are my neighbor department students.
The lecturer is one of the senior in that department and the students are afraid of him [the said lecturer] to complain to the university authorities regarding this as because he will take some other subjects in the coming semesters.
Please suggest, what to do in this context.?