Sunny Honey
12 December 2009 at 13:15
As per the provisions of Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, PIOs are restricted from dispensing with any private information relating to a person/individual. NOW WHAT IF, THE PIO DISPENSES WITH SUCH PRIVATE INFORMATION CONCERNING A PERSON TO THE THIRD PARTY I.E.(INFORMATION SEEKER) IN AN RTI APPLICATION,
1) CAN THE PERSON WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO SENT BRING OUT AN ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST SUCH PIO BY FILING A CRIMINAL CASE OF DEFAMATION AS GOVERNED BY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 500 I.P.C OF 1860 ?
2)IF NOT, WHAT RECOURSE THE PERSON (WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO GIVEN HAS, TO TEACH THE PIO A LESSON(AS THE PIO HAS RELEASED AN EXEMPTED DISCLOSURE GOVERNED BY SECTION 8(1)(J) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005.
AN URGENT REPLY IN THE MATTER WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
MAIL ME EARLY...THANKX
Sunny Honey
14 December 2008 at 18:27
Hi everyone,
Can anybody guide me regarding books. Which are the best books on the subject of EVIDENCE, INTERPRETATION OF STATUES, at student level (LL.B) Examination. - URGENT REPLY NEEDED ?
Sunny Honey
08 December 2008 at 13:24
1. Is section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 compoundable, (if yes with/without the permission of the court ? Quote if possible recent citation of the Supreme Court on this matter. - Urgent reply needed.
2.Can the court force the complainant to compromise the case under section 138 N.I.Act, 1881 (Criminal complaint) if the accused agrees to pay of the amount involved by virtue of cheque, at a stage after the service of summons failed, after the warant of arrest fails to get executed, but before the process of proclamation is UNDERWAY ? If answer to the above said question is in the affirmative then, please quote the relevant textual matter,and recent supreme court citation on this matter, immediately, urgent reply NEEDED.
3.Please quote relevant judgements of the Apex court (preferably) on this matter, any recent judgement will be highly appreciated in this matter.
Member Strength 9,47,825 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
RTI Act, 2005 (URGENT REPLY REQUIRED)
A PIO DISPENSES THE INFORMATION CONCERNING A PERSON,(HAVING RELATION TO A MATTER IN RESPECT OF WHICH A DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY STANDS PENDING) TO A INFORMATION SEEKER UNDER RTI ACT, 2005.
SINCE THE RULING AVAILABLE IN THE CASE OF SARVESH KAUSHAL vs F.C.I. AND OTHERS 243/ICPB/2006 AND 244/ICPB/2006 CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTS THE FACTS DULY GIVEN CONSIDERATION BY THE AUTHORITY BEFORE WHOM SUCH ISSUE WAS PENDING THAT --- NO DISCLOSURE IN CASE OF PENDING DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY (AS IT WAS COVERED BY SECTION 8(1)(J) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005.
NOW SINCE THE PIO HAS DISPENSED THE INFORMATION RELATING TO A MATTER IN RESPECT OF WHICH ENQUIRY WAS PENDING, CAN THE PERSON WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO GIVEN BRING OUT AN ACTION FOR DAMAGES IN FORM OF DEFAMATION AGAINST THE PIO FOR GRAVELY VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE RTI ACT / OR GROSSLY VIOLATING THE DUE CONSIDERATIONS ARRIVED AT BY THE AUTHORITY DECIDING SUCH ISSUE IN THE AFORESAID RULING.
AN URGENT REPLY IN THE MATTER REQUIRED.