Anonymous
14 April 2010 at 01:08
hi members!my sister had a register marriage on 29.09.2008 when my papa was hospitalized.later my sister and her legal husband stayed in a flat of her mother-in-law .At that time her mother-in-law and father-in-law both were staying at govt campus.They said to stay separately because the govt flat was too small.they had kept all the jeweleries in the mean time and all the furnitures and filed a petition that the marriage has not been consummated.my father died and they didn't refunded anything but always said they will refund in-front of court. They denied in the court on 16.03.2010,to give anything and nothing is with them.my sister do not want to reconcile with such family.can she now file 498a?please help.
Anonymous
13 April 2010 at 19:37
can a written list of questions to be asked be kept in his hand by the advocate who is cross-examining an accused? kindly tell.
Manjulehh Tripathi
12 April 2010 at 23:25
Hi,
This is manjulesh tripathi, this is my first query.
I helped a person, by giving him about 2.11 laks in various installments.I have a written agreement from him (on 100 Re Stamp paper) stating that, he has borrowed 2.11 lakhs from me and issued one cheque for the same amount in 2008. in the agreement, he has mentioned that he will repay the amount within 24 months. now he is refusing to even acknowledge the agreement and has told me that i have forged the agreement and the cheque. He is now refusing to pay the money back.
my question is:-
1. Should I bank the cheque and take him to court from there on.
2. Is the agreement valid.
3. What is the recourse available to me to recover the amount.
please help.
Y Singh N Rajput
11 April 2010 at 07:09
Party filed a case u/s 138 alleging cheque bounce, purportedly issued for payment of part interest of the principal amount. Plaintiff says that the principal amount was extended as secured loan against property. The palintiff's prime occupation was service in a state government department. He had no licence for money lending. This appears to be a an isolated case on record of money lending. On cross examination the plaintiff agreed that he had no capacity to tender the large amount. He says that his acount was operated by a third party who conducted transactions. Allied facts include -1. The mortgage deed was unregistered. -2. The details of cheques in the mortgage deed and banker's certificate also differ.-3. No civil /cr case filed for recovery of the pricipal amount.
Please comment about (a) whether the plaintiff can be regarded as a money lender? (b) what are chances of plaintiff winning this case?
walia
06 April 2010 at 17:59
plz explain me what is meant by RCR in law. plz gave me its full form?. thnxs in advance
Anonymous
06 April 2010 at 05:50
Sir,
Can my daughter ask the Hon'ble Family court to issue a notice to the original petitioner on his official address (as his residential address is not known) to attend the court.He is being represented by his GPA.The petitioner has not attended the court from filing OP till date.The OP was filed by his GPA.Kindly advise.
Anonymous
03 April 2010 at 12:37
If there is a dispute with regards to legal heirs of a workman .Whether a decree obtained by way of settlement would be binding on the employer.
Adv.Aiyer VLV
02 April 2010 at 16:26
on road market happens in residential area and front of our house gets covered by shops and vehicles making unlawful infrigment, private and public nuisance to the residents.
when matter was brought to corporation the commissioner orders no market to be run with board declaring unauthorised market must not be run. but petty politicians and officials of corporation who were earning hafta, continued market. now even police have joined the hafta business.
corporation refused to accept complaint filed.
police say they can't take complaint on corporation officials.
What is the procedure?
Member Strength 9,47,528 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
What Action against the police
Hello,
As you know I have having a matrimonial dispute with my wife. On the statements of the girl the police has lodged a FIR against me U/s 498a/406/34 and 3/4 of Dowry P.Act.
During the investigation there are around 4 false bills in the file as I have seen myself.
I have managed to get one of them bill through RTI.
Now the investigation is over and the challan(charge sheet) has been filed in the court. There i came to know that there are only 2 bills left in the file. The bill which i got under RTI act is not in that file. Another false bill of jewellery is not there in the file, which was there during investigation.
Plz. help me what to do. As the police officials has malafidely disposed that bills to help that girl.
How can i prove in the court that the bills have been disposed malafidely just to help the girl.