S.M. Suresh
09 March 2012 at 04:23
I have some shares (about 130) of a well known company, held by a close relation,in physical form. I asked him to demat in my account but he has not taken interest to do so.How can I know the Folio # and other details without his help. Just to add, I had shares of the same company some 15 years ago which I sold.
Advocate Abhijeet singh
08 March 2012 at 21:23
sir my que is very difficult , History is that my father filed a case against his department in year 2000. The case listed in Punjab and haryana high court. but case now till outstanding and now my father has been expired and now i searched the advocate that my father appointed and me not know that that time what he filed ? tell me now is my mother filed suit in lower court in this regard
Mrs. Trupti Patil
08 March 2012 at 18:25
Can an accussed get a bail in the charge of IPC sec 376 when the prosecutrix is above 16 years of age?
rani
08 March 2012 at 17:18
If an government establsihment or statutory body have not complied the direction of court , what action can be taken ?
FEROZ PALITANAWALA
15 January 2012 at 19:24
Is Franking Document if not registered within Six months valid for registration after that(say after 2/3 years)?
mahesan
06 January 2012 at 18:56
property situated tamilnadu
Hindu father and his minor son (Guardian mother) partitioned their ancestral properties in the year of 1983, without two daughters? Daughters what share entitled? Daughters married after the year of 1989.
anil kumar agarwal
02 January 2012 at 19:56
some agriculture land in way back in 1961 WAS ALLOTED TO three MENS JOINTLY , 1/4 TO A, 1/4 TO B [BROTHER OF A]1/2 TO C [FATHER IN LAW OF A] IN 2008 A FILED A SUITE AGAINST B IN REVENUE COURT AND SUBMITTED THAT NO PERSONS NAMED C EXITED IN THE VILLAGE AND HE ALONGWITH B IS CULTIVATING LAND FOR LAST 40 YEARS SO THERE SHARE BE DIVIDED, B AS RESPONEDED SUBMITED NO OBJECTION AND REVENUE COURT PASSED A DEGREE WHERBY A WAS DECLARED 3/4 0WNER AND B 1/4 OWNER. C SHARE DECLARED NIL. LATERON SUCCESSOR OF C FILED A CRIMINAL CASE UNDER 420 IPC , CAN A AND B PROSECUTED UNDER 420. 209. 120 IPC ON THIS COMPLAINT
Chetan Pardakhe
02 January 2012 at 19:54
That in the case u/s 363,376 IPC the accused released on bail
After releasing the bail, the accused again attemp to rape on the complaint of which the seperate offence is registered against him u/s 354 IPC and also he threatend to the relative of the victim for which the relative lodged the complaint which is registered u/s 504, 506 IPC
Under such circumstance can victim filed application before session Court for cancellation of Bail
whether the said application be filed by Private Advocate of by Prosecutor
KETAN V VARAIYA
02 January 2012 at 12:46
the client has not paid any fees since last eight years
Member Strength 9,46,801 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Civil matter
My name is Kiran I am A CA Pursuant and a Finance Professional
My case is :
My cousin Who joined an Engineering college 2008 in B. Tech Program in 2008 and he got through the first three years. and if every thing were gone good he ill complete his b.tech this march (2012 march) but his fate gone wrong track. his father who is a VRO (government employee) dies of some decease in 2011 Aug. after his father died he has to complete some formalities on behalf of his mother due to this he didnt go to college and he is doing some private job for his family expenses with out going to college. now he is in no position to pay forth year fee and complete his B.Tech program. now to apply for some other jobs he need his 10+2 certificates which were given to the Engineering college when he joined the B.Tech. now the College Management is restricting him to take his certificates. they are saying that he has to pay forth year fee which costs him 55,000 and collect the certificates even he dint go to college for forth year. some one please guide me to help him.
Can Anyone see this matter as the college Management is abstracting collaterally the right to live and right to education by just pressuring my cousin to pay the forth year fee.
why cant the courts see the matter in such a way that the management is going to restrict the boy in doing the job for his livelihood which aims to RIGHT TO LIVE.
why cant the courts are or us see this matter that the management is Pressuring for the fee for which it just not given the couching. for which we can file case in Consumer court.
Why cant courts understand that the victim and his mother who are "HOLDER IN DUE COURSE" at the time of signing on the addmission application for not leaving the college until the course completed.
because at the time of signing on application or at the time of joining the college no management could say " the boy should stay with the college until he completed his course". they think this is implied conditions so not necessary to tell either the student or the parent.
so that the college Management had not told about the restriction of leaving the college in any condition. they are all implied so how the student or his illiterate parents could know the implied condition of the College Management.
can we file a writ not in the consumer courts in Civil court as the Management had not told about the restrictions of leaving so the boy is eligible for the originals.