Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

sanjeev kumar   24 December 2016 at 22:44

498a

Dear sir Mere pe phale 125 ka case hua usme mujhe vedadi lane ka order hua jab lane gya to mere sasur ne lane nhi diya fir usne 498a ka jhuta case court me kr diya usme mujhe notice aaya hai ab btaiye mujhe kya krna chaiye ab to mujhe bail krwani pregi kya or kyse bell milegi mujhe plz sir reply mai bhut presan hu meri ijaj karab ho rahi hai ab mujhe kya krna hoga ki mujhe or mere family ko bail mil jaay or mai kya ab divorce file kr sakta hu kya

Ajay Kumar Reddy   24 December 2016 at 20:09

Weather it is cime if it is then how to prosicute

Respected Experts,
My ex wife has given cross examination in family court but she has given the wrong & lie information to the another court of DV that SHE IS ILL and unable to attend the court.
Now My question:-
1. Weather it is crime under section 177IPC?
2. Weather it is permissible on IPC 177?
3. How to prosecute this crime?

Please guide me & help me on this matter

Thank you,

Ajay Kumar Reddy

deepak kumar   24 December 2016 at 16:47

Bus driver & conductor smoking and misbehaving

SIR,
WHAT ACTION WE CAN TAKE......

IF A BUS DRIVER SMOKING (BIRI) & DRIVING A METRO FEEDER BUS AND CONDUCTOR ALSO SMOKING DESPITE MANY REQUESTING TO STOP SMOKING ..THEY MISBEHAVE AND STARTED ABUSING A PASSENGER(WHO AN ADVOCATE IN HIS UNIFORM). CONDUCTOR FORCING TO GET DOWN FROM THE BUS WHEN BUS RUNNING.

INCIDENT TOOK PLACE DATED 12 APRIL 2016.
AT THAT TIME LODGE A COMPLAINT AT 100 . POLICE TOLD TO KEEP QUITE AND LEAVE IT. THEN WROTE A LETTER TO HEADQUATER OF POLICE NEW DELHI .NOTHING HAPPEN TILL NOW.


SUGGEST ME WHAT TO DO NOW.

Gagan Souri   04 December 2016 at 23:30

Evidence not marked/exhibited in 498a case can be used for criminal defamation

Hello LCI,

Brief:
PW1, PW2, PW3 – Complainant/Father/Mother gave their version in Chief, then defence counsel cross examined.
Remaining Witness 3,4,5,6 & 7 all are absent.
Other Witness8 is SI and is IO for part. And the last witness9 is CI and is IO for the overall case. The witness8 & 9 failed to give their version in chief when countered by my defence counsel

It is almost favour case for defence (accused victim no.1 in this 498a case)

No question of defence evidence rose as such there is no successful by prosecution witness

This evidence may be very much helpful in defence evidence if prosecution witness were successful.

Query:
Evidence not marked/exhibited in 498a case can be used for criminal defamation


Thanks

Syed Ali   05 November 2016 at 07:48

Discrepancy in judgement

Sir if there is discrepancy in the judgement where should it be clarified.

Priya   04 November 2016 at 10:25

Please suggest- Divorce and maintenance cases

Hello everyone,

I have applied for divorce and after several attempts of sending the summons to my husband, he attended to the court and wants me to take back to his house.

He didn't respect to the maintenance order passed by the court 2 years back and didn't pay me any amount till now.

But one of his lawyer is even trying to settle the cases by paying the amount.

Considering above two scenarios, please suggest if I can go back to my in laws house and lead my marital life.

If I need to go back to my in laws house,please suggest on the steps I need to take care.

Thanks

sanjeev kumar   16 October 2016 at 10:59

Removal from service after 498a conviction

D/Sir,
I have been convicted for 1 yr SI and subsequently my employer has removed me from service with no financial benefits.Appeal to the appellate auth also declined.Am I eligible for any benefits?Appeal pending in the HC.
regrdas

sameer   29 September 2016 at 04:11

Is it necessary to reply within time mentioned in the notice

1.Is there is necessary to reply within time mentioned (30 days) in the notice received ?

2.Can we request the opposite adv that we require some more days (add 25 days) to reply due to defendent Busy and not in town right now?
and give reply within additional time requested?

3. Is answerring within additional time is valid in court of law as all proof available with defendent.

irfan   22 September 2016 at 16:19

Complaint against judge

Dear experts,
Thank you for your great support in my previous queries. I wish to raise one more query and seek your valuable time and support.
In the DV dismissal application was submitted from my end however; neither any say from other side nor order has been given by judge.
Post my application her advocate requested time & approached us for compromise. Accordingly we have given 50k and khula to her.
Following which she submitted withdrawal application in DV and our signature is also been done on the same moreover both side advocate were signed. This activity was done front of judge however, on order kept pending and the next date given.
She did not appear in 5 dates and her advocate keeps promising that she will attend next date. All of sudden an advocate change application submitted by her, we strongly objected however judge allowed. After learning the fact her advocate appear and denied to handle her case.
We have strongly requested judge to decide on our pending dismissal applications. Judge assured my advocate that on next date she will order on our dismissal application.
However, on next date again an advocate change request submitted by wife. Judge did not order on our application but accepted the advocate change request and next date given.
Judge seems to be biased and no uniformity in my case. All my application are pending, even withdrawal application but she has allowed new applications of advocate change application instead of order on pending one.
I do not know where is my case going what would the stages. Please guide me how to do I complaint against judge and what are the stages if judge do not order on withdrawal application.

Y Singh N Rajput   04 September 2016 at 08:38

Appeal against jugement

Mr Y filed a police complaint against Mr X for fraud. Police investigated and subsequently arrested Mr X, (who took bail). The case dragged for 15 years. Meanwhile the police inspector expired without examination by court. Mr Y did not attend to the court. The court acquitted Mr X for want of evidence. Mr Y has evidence now wants to restart this case. Is it possible? The case was between Government v/s Mr X.