G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
16 September 2015 at 22:27
Who are responsible for forwarding pension papers? Whether employee or DDO?
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
10 November 2013 at 21:42
Sir! I need the G.O. number which is concerned with the increasing the levying the stamp duty on the Gift deeds by the A.P. Government, from 3% to 5% in respect of the Gift deeds between blood relatives. With regards... Gangu Naga Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate, (Addl. P.P.) Jangaon, Warangal District, A.P.,
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
24 November 2011 at 23:58
Dear Experts!
I am having a case on hand that- a tenant has purchased a mulgi / shop. He has been in the possession in the said shop as tenant. The tenant has entered in to an agreement of sale unregistered one, the same is reduced into writing on Rs.100/- stamp paper. The total value of the shop (building) is Rs.5 lakhs. out of which he paid Rs.2 lakhs as advance, thereafter he again paid an amount of Rs.2 lakhs to the land lard. There is a recital in the document that there is no interest charged in future on the said Rs.2 lakhs and there is no rent for the shop, which he is purchased. My contention is that his possession is continuing as tenant only. the learned judge's contention is that the possession of the tenant is seized and he is perfected his possession as purchaser as per the agreement of sale and the said agreement is to be seen as sale deed or conveyance deed. Therefore it is required to be stamped as if a sale deed. Therefore the deficit stamp duty shall be levied. For that I have differed. The learned judge is relaying on B.Ratnamala Vs G. Rudramma A.P. High Court (D.B.). Hence I need citation of supreme court, urgently. The case is posted to 28/11/2011 for further hearing. please help me.
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
17 October 2011 at 22:01
Dear friends & Experts! in the Telangana issue the Joint Action Committee is called for rail roko. The Government is foisted false cases against the aggitators under section 353, 147, 148, 149 I.P.C., section 7 of criminal law amendment act, and also sections 147, 150, 152 & 153 of Railway Act. The cases are lodged by the law and order police of state Government of A.P. on the instructions of D.G.P. of Andhra Pradesh. The question is whether the law and order police [i.e. state police] is having powers to lodge the cases? another question is the railway court is having power to entertain the I.P.C. cases [since it is a special court]?
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
31 August 2011 at 21:08
Dear friends & seniors!
I would like to know that..... Once a person "X" is executed sale deed in favour of "Y". The "X" is intending to cancell the same with the consent of "Y". Then whether the "X" can execute a cancellation deed of the sale deed with the support of "Y" without paying stamp duty on the property? or is there any requirement to pay the stamp duty on the property value as if the cancellation deed is treated as "Reconveyance of sale"? Thank you one and all.
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
02 July 2011 at 22:50
Suit filed by the plaintiff on the mortgage deed. Preliminary decree passed on contesting. The final decree petition also filed and it is dismissed. While pending the final decree the plaintiff did not persued the matter, as the claim is compromised before elders and the plaintiff has passed a receipt for certain amount as full satisfaction of the suit claim. Accordingly the final decree petion is dismissed in default, at that stage the defendant has filed the said receipt in the court. The plaintiff has filed a restoration petiton with section 5 of limitation act petition. The sec. 5 of limitation act petition is also dismissed in default. Thereafter the plaintiff has filed a petition of restoration of that sec.5 of limitation act petition, it is also dismissed in the year 2007. The defendant had filed a criminal case with the police, the police charged for illegal detension of the defendant. The criminal case was tried by the Judicial First Class magistrate, and it was ended in Acquittal in the year 2008. [The plaintiff and the defenant both are cousins]. Thereafter the plaintiff has filed another civil case for damages for malicious prosecution. This case / suit is pending before the Court. The senior civil judge is without any application of either side, he called the record in the final decree petition which was already dismissed in the year 2007 itself, and he is put into writing on the docket in the damages suit, which is not the subject matter in that suit, and he ordered to send the receipt for expert opinion, and he ordered to pay the expert fee by the both parties equally @ Rs.1500/-
My question is that whether the court is having power to send the document to the expert, which was already dismissed in the year 2007 itself and there is no proceeding before him, with regarding to the said issue?
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
28 May 2011 at 15:07
Wife filed divorce petition in U.K. and summons received by husband in India from U.K. court directing him to file his papers and replies within 21 days. The marriage to dissolved by consent. Whether husband can appear before the U.K. court, without going to U.K. and the petition for divorce can be allowed on admission of by the husband through his attorney in U.K. Court [or] Whether the husband is required to be present in person before the U.K. court for consent divorce decree?
Anonymous
10 May 2011 at 14:43
Husband is driver in A.P.S.R.T.C., He was married firstly one lady. She left his society at his young age. Thereafter he married my client. Her name is incorporated in service book as nominee for his benefits. My client got four children through her husband. she is now 56 years old. All the children settled. Nobody is looking after her. Husband residing with a concubine in another village. He got purchased about Ac.8-00 guntas in the name of that concubine. He saying that his retirement benefits and other benefits will not be given to my client. Accordingly my client i.e. wife filed a domestic violence [pro] case against her husband and she made his employers as proforma parties to the case. Husband did not appear though he received notices. The employers contested the case. The case is disposed in favour of the wife and directed the husband to pay the half of the retirement benefits and maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month granted till the date of payment of the half of the retirement benefits and the court directed the employers to implement the order. The things stood so. Husband filed an appeal on the said order of the JMFC. His allegation is that the court is erred in passing the order and not directed any protection officer to file his/her report with regarding to the domestic violence incident. My query is whether the report of the protection officer is mandatory or it is directory one? please clarify and suggest any citation/s. Thanks one and all.
G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
06 May 2011 at 21:50
I required AIR 2011 MP 18 is required in a suit. please help me.
Member Strength 9,46,705 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Document of opposite party, marking by other party
plaintiff filed a document along with plaint. But failed to get it marked during the trial. The document is crucial for the defendant. Whether the defendant can get it marked? if so, any authority is there? (for marking of document by defendant which produced by plaintiff along with plaint and intentionally omitted to mark it on behalf of the plaintiff)