The advocates act
Sadanand B. Panchal
(Querist) 12 October 2012
This query is : Resolved
Respected Experts,
I am Plaintiff in person in my personal matter being not an Advocate. At the time of primary stage of the hearing of my N/M, I several times argued before Hon’ble trial Court by standing side of the Advocates. The other Advocates including Defendants Junior Advocates respected me and allowed me to argue by standing behind the line of Advocates. The Junior Advocate of the Defendant also requested me to stand at the Chair of the advocate and gave be reading table to keep my proceedings on it. On very important stage of the hearing the head of the Defendants Advocate presented at the time, insulted me and ordered me that I have no right to stand in the rank of the Advocate and further loudly ordered me to stand in the witness box and argue. There was a crowd of about 80 persons before the Court including Advocates and there was Honnour Judge watching the situation. I given respect to the said Advocate and argued the matter through the witness box. This is a real story. When any Advocate arguing his clients matter, his concerned client is always standing at the side or behind him, not at the witness box. It is the real fact that because of the clients matter the respected Advocate is appointed and appeared before Hon'ble Court. I experienced that the site where the respected Advocate stand is safe to hear each sound of the parties Advocate as well as Hon’ble Judge. I found difficulty that I cannot hear properly through witness box and also Hon’ble Judge first time supposed me I am standing to give evidence before Hon’ble Court.
Please inform me whether Plaintiff in person can argue his personal case by standing in front of the Hon’ble Judge of Trial Court? Kindly in future any Advocate insult me as aforesaid what shall I do?
Regards,
Sadanand B.Panchal
J K Agrawal
(Expert) 13 October 2012
Dear Sir
To appoint an advocate to conduct a case is not necessary at all. One can well argue his own case by standing just in front of the Court. It was not the defamation of you but it was insult of whole the Court. The Judge of the Court is guilty and not you. Please forget the incident as we the advocates should keep our mind and soul sound enough to face such a hurdles.
But I would like say one more thing that you, your self, is liable up to full extent for your insult. You should have taken an adjournment on this issue and should have studied the law.
Next time you have so many chances to prove that you are a good lawyer.
Sadanand B. Panchal
(Querist) 13 October 2012
Respected Lawyer J.K. Agrawal,
Thanks a lot, may God bless you. I will keep in mind your valuable advice while appearing before Hon'ble Court.Yes I was thought guilty but there was no meaning to take an adornment that very next one hour the old Jamun Tree in my compound for which I want to protect was felled by the Defendant and the very next day the Hon'ble Advocate who insult me was died by heart attach and also very next day my case was transferred to adjacent Court. The matter is of City Civil Court at Dindoshi Mumbai.
But I made my encourage to ask the Hon'ble Judge before which the said matter was called, the Judge told me that because I did not inserted the location of the tree in the Plaint, the Hon'ble Court did not pass the order to protect the tree. This is not my explanation to support my guilty. I will keep in mind your Honours advice and fight against instantly such injustice and will make attempt to prove to be a good Lawyer which is a pride to me.Thanks ones again,
Regards,
Sadanand B. Panchal
