LIVE Online Course on NDPS by Riva Pocha and Adv. Taraq Sayed. Starting from 24th May. Register Now!!
LAW Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Information under rti

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2017 This query is : Resolved 
I was given compulsory retirement from Border Roads Organisation on the allegation of misappropriation and manipulation of documents and excess payment to contractors but there was a preliminary inquiry in which i was called to depose and and there was an assessment of the works executed/ paid buy Board of officers and it was found that there was no discrepancy and contractor were paid the amount withheld by the department through arbitration proceedings. Now department is not furnishing the Inquiry report and Board to assess the quantum of work executed and paid taking the shelter of exemption clauses of RTI Act.
Guest (Expert) 30 September 2017
Under RTI, you may better call the whole of the (1) Report of BOO, including their findings, (2) Proceedings of the Arbitrator, (3) Report along with recommendations of the Arbitrator, (4) Copies of paid vouchers to the contractor, etc. You can get the whole insider information through all these documents to proceed further.

Evidently, if the amount has already been paid to contractor treating his claim to be genuine, your compulsory retirement can be termed as illegal and you can be reinstated in service, provided you plan and present your case perfectly through appeal to the departmental appellate authority or CAT, as the case may be.
Guest (Expert) 30 September 2017
Real practical advice by Mr. Dhingra.
Isaac Gabriel (Expert) 30 September 2017
Anonymous are not encouraged here.
Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 September 2017
AQ.................so NO reply..............
Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 September 2017
Pls post with your ID and you can get many replies................
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2017
Shri issac ji,
How it is going to make difference. If some one has query regarding any issue. However i have logged in and replying
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2017
My ID is sksinghal66@gmail.com
Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 September 2017
Similar queries are also discussed at many threads in FORUM/EXPERTS section that you can search in SEARCH option..................and you can also SEARCH in other sections ..................Articles, Files, Judgments...............


Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 September 2017
There has been many publications of unsuspecting querists getting allured and fleeced at LCI by posers and impostors to extract FEE in the name of some online consultations, by entities posing as some Chief Lawyer (While the entity is LIAR and not a lawyer) advertisement of LAW FIRMS (For LAIR's firm) and open declarations that money/FEE paid can not be got refunded from the entities...............

Their post is usually followed by another of multiple fake ID's with Salutes for previous fake ID, to complete the drama.


Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 September 2017
Otherwise also you have posted query quite diligently, clearly and same reply can be given by even a junior.


Approach a very able senior LOCAL counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in Labor/Service matters and having successful track record...............and an able Defense Assistant .................

Dr. J.C.Vashista is from defense background and post on matters as posted by you, at LCI.

If you wish you can approach him.
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2017
My ID is sksinghal66@gmail.com
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2017
Thanks Dhingra Ji for your Expert advice
Advocate M.Bhadra (Expert) 30 September 2017
Your case is not obtain an information through RTI. Please file a Writ Petition in High Court.
Guest (Expert) 01 October 2017
You are welcome, Mr. S.K. Singhal.
Guest (Expert) 01 October 2017
@SK Singhal,

In fact, a few of the so called fake experts, when don't have any solution, just try to play merely a number game to add scores by making vague posts. You would already have noticed that in spite of saying, no reply to you, he made four vague posts. A question arises, when he decided not to reply, what for he made 4 posts in reply to your query. Just a s a number game to FALSELY ADD SCORES to their profile, as if he has advised thousands of person and earned huge fame! As a confirmation his number game, you can see at his profile, where he has written, "I SHALL PREFER TO POST at LCI," I.E, HE BELIEVES ONLY IN MAKING POSTS, NOT TO GIVE "ADVICE".

So, you need not worry about their statements. They can well be identified easily by any querist from their vague posts.

Just see the fun, How Mr. Kumar Doab dares to say you anonymous, when everything of his is fake and false at his LCI profile. For the last 7 years he is appearing with an unreal name, fake identity and has not shown even his face (picture) and location. But still makes unwanted multiple vague posts.

You can notice another funny thing, when he himself is anonymous, but his advice has been liked by someone when he said, "please post your ID and you can get many replies....." Who can be that person, you can guess, who could have liked his worthless post? That can only be Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, supposed to be his close associate. But another thing to notice is that he has kept his profile totally blank without mentioning, who he is and what expertise he has got. Not only that he appears by hiding his face behind a 2 years' old infant. A question arises, can a 2 years old infant child be a legal expert? Another question arises, why he prefers not to post his own picture and keeps himself in hiding, if he is really an expert?

So, you can very well understand, why should you rely on such type of cheaters, who falsely claim to be experts, but don't give any advice?

You will notice another funny thing, even when you have already revealed your identity, both of them would never come forward with any realistic advice that can be considered of any worth.

Anyone can guess, why a person keeps in hide out that is only when he is some hardened criminal or a suspected terrorist, as has been pointed out by some other expert also. I saw some of the posts, where that expert openly challenged Mr. Kumar Doab to drag him in to the court of law, if he was wrong in his statement. He often uses a code word, "IT=@PSD" but has never clarified what that means, when asked several times earlier. Apparently code words are used by suspected terrorists only for flashing some message for his group terrorists, may be for murdering some specific person.

Now, you can expect another amazing thing. As usual, as on several other threads, Mr. Kumar Doab (unreal name) will start making abusive posts aiming at me, as I have tried to expose both of each other's associates.
Guest (Expert) 01 October 2017
Mr. Jigyasu seems to be really an ideal jigyasu (learner), if has has learned so many things about some experts, as he mentioned. I endorse his views to full extent.
P. Venu (Expert) 01 October 2017
Is it your case that you have been given the punishment of compulsory retirement after a preliminary inquiry? Was no charge-memo for disciplinary proceedings served on you? If so, what was the defence statement you had furnished?
Why information under RTI?
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 01 October 2017
No advice to query from me to an author who is anonymous.

You can post the query in fresh thread with your identity and material facts.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 02 October 2017
fully agreed with Mr Dhingra.
Guest (Expert) 02 October 2017
@ Anonymous Querist,

Another number game is being played by Mr. Rajendra K Goyal. He says, no advice. Who compelled him to give advice. Did you make a specific request to Mr. Rajendra K Goyal to advice?

Advice (positive) or NO advice (negative) essential is an advice. But when he decided not to advice, he still makes a negative advice. Question arises, when you did not make any request specifically to Mr. Rajendra K Goyal,.what urgency he felt to post his negative advice, as an information to you, more so, when he does not know ABC of BRO or about process of COI or BOO?
Guest (Expert) 02 October 2017
@ Anonymous Querist,

Another number game is being played by Mr. Rajendra K Goyal. He says, no advice. Who compelled him to give advice. Did you make a specific request to Mr. Rajendra K Goyal to advice?

Advice (positive) or NO advice (negative) essential is an advice. But when he decided not to advice, he still makes a negative advice. Question arises, when you did not make any request specifically to Mr. Rajendra K Goyal,.what urgency he felt to post his negative advice, as an information to you, more so, when he does not know ABC of BRO or about process of COI or BOO?


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :





Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query