contract

This query is : Resolved 
 

(Querist)
06 July 2009

i lodged complain regarding the cancel of the transacation of the flat due to rejection of loan due to not perform the sale agreement by the opponent i joined the two parties 1] from where the representative who collected the cheques from me 2] and another main office [head office ] having the name x developers now opponet lawyer came with the application to delete the no- 1 who is not a party because he is only employee of the head office and the other office is created ant the local location having kept name x precious
have any judgment not to delete the person who has done work on behalf of the head office which is appointed by the company ples discuss the said matter thanks to all experts


Y V Vishweshwar Rao (Expert)
07 July 2009

Yes the Local Officers/ staff/agents of the X develoepr need not be deleted, they are required to be onrecord , as they have actually delt with the purchaser on behalf of the Comapny /Developer& collected money - ofcourse they may not be persoanlly liable for the calim /decree - they are proper parties in transactions .

n.k.sarin (Expert)
07 July 2009

I do agree with Mr.Rao.

Kiran Kumar (Expert)
07 July 2009

pls refer to Order 1 Rules 1, 3 and 5.

i ll find few judgements as well.

a.manoharan (Expert)
07 July 2009

Dear Mr. Prakash,
Please first clarify the legal position of 1st and 2nd defendants. Because, there is differences in adding parties when filing depending on personal , partnership firm or company nature. plainly saying 1st and 2nd are not enough.



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :









×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu