Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Any ruling by supreme court claiming for appointment

(Querist) 17 June 2018 This query is : Resolved 
Hello sir
The interviews of 56 candidates shortlisted on the basis of written examination conducted on 15-05-2016 for the post of [08] scientist B in the ministry of new and renewable energy were held from 11 to 13 April 2018
2 Out of total 56 candidates called for Interview, Only 50 appeared before the interview board
3. The board did not find any candidate suitable for appointment as scientist B in the ministry.keeping in mind the technical competence and preparedness required for this job
4. the weight age of marks in written examination and interview was 85 : 15
5 one candidate got 262 out of 300 marks in written examination where cut of for general category was 204 6. when we applied for RTI we got not information anything about interview mark , criteria for selection etc
7.there was no secure mark fixed in advertisement for interview and written examination
i want to consult should we file for case or not .would be beneficial .if we file for case which point should we highlights
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 18 June 2018
the merit list is to be prepared as per (weighted) marks of interview and written. where are you in the said list.
Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 18 June 2018
I agree with Sudhir Kumar.
Isaac Gabriel (Expert) 18 June 2018
Answer to your query is given in item 3.Perhaps the list would have been closed,since you have mentioned the RTI did not fetch reply.
Kuldeep (Querist) 18 June 2018
sir i asked from rti what was my rank in marit list
they replyed as per recommended of the Interview Board No candidate was found suitable for appointment as Scientist B in the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy ,keeping in mind the technical competence and preparedness required for the job
we also asked for technical competence and preparedness required for this post they replyed The information sought does not fall under the definition of lnformation as given under section 2 [f] of RTI Act 2005
Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 19 June 2018
I agree with Sudhir Kumar.
Kuldeep (Querist) 19 June 2018
Hello Sir
what should be our next step in the given circumstances
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 20 June 2018
whether you were or you were not in merit list.
Kuldeep (Querist) 20 June 2018
NO final merit list was displayed or even shared on the website or along with any RTI response
Guest (Expert) 20 June 2018
When you state, "NO final merit list was displayed or even shared on the website or along with any RTI response" then on what basis you could elaborate such a vast information, as you mentioned in your query?

Guest (Expert) 20 June 2018
When you state, "NO final merit list was displayed or even shared on the website or along with any RTI response" then on what basis you could elaborate such a vast information, as you mentioned in your query?
Kuldeep (Querist) 20 June 2018
Sir
final notice of MNRE website is The interviews of 56 candidates shortlisted on the basis of written examination conducted on 15-05-2016 for the post of [08] scientist B in the ministry of new and renewable energy were held from 11 to 13 April 2018, Out of total 56 candidates called for Interview, Only 50 appeared before the interview board The board did not find any candidate suitable for appointment as scientist B in the ministry.keeping in mind the technical competence and preparedness required for this job�
No final marit list was displayed
The 85:15 criteria, the marks of the topper and the cutoff for written examination was given by MNRE in the RTI responses. However, MNRE did not provide any significant information,interview marks
Marit list,reason or any ground for thier decision.
Kuldeep (Querist) 21 June 2018
Only on the basis of interview, every candidate was declared unsuccessful While only 15 percentage weightage for interview marks
Kuldeep (Querist) 25 June 2018
Hello Sir what should be our next step in the given circumstances



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :