LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ANURAG   16 August 2008 at 16:14

criminal law.

1.>what is the extent of the limitation of the word "sudden" in the section 335 and 334 of the ipc that is grave and sudden provocation leading to death of the deceased.


2.>acc to sec 300(3) of the IPC that the bodily injury shud be sufficient i ordinary course of nature to cause death. on what grounds or evidence can the word "sufficient" be proved.

3.>how one accussed can get the benefit of doubt if he has caused bodily injured that is shooting someone twice, the provocation being grave but not sudden in this case as the accussed went off to bring his gun and came along with a colleague .

Shekhar   16 August 2008 at 13:11

Can a complaint's photocopy be taken by defandent?

Pls. share the various way through to get the complaint copy from the police station ?

srikanth   16 August 2008 at 12:49

Auditor as liquidator

Can an auditor act as a liquidator of a company?
if yes what are the necessary procedures to be followed for appointing the auditor as liquidator

ram   16 August 2008 at 11:56

Decleration of vendor

While Purchaed a property if any decleration from the vendor who is non study person and unable to sing (ill -letarute person)

Chandan Garg   16 August 2008 at 11:56

Agreement with builders.

In our company we hire the builders to construct housing, big projects , flats and all that.

can we make some agreement with them in which they can give us guarantee against the defects for next 4-5 years
or
How can we make some agreement with them,if in case the building get some defect or collapse even after 4-5 years they can be held responsible.

if yes than please provide the format.

vinod menon   15 August 2008 at 23:17

WINNING THE JACKPOT!

HELLO ALL..
I'VE BEEN A REGULAR IN PLAYING THE ONLINE LOTTERY GAME FOR SOME TIME NOW (RESPONSIBLE ENOUGH TO REALISE WHAT EXTEND I SPEND :-)) I'VE BEEN WINNING THE SMALL SUMS SAY.. 150$, 100$ ETC. WELL, MY QUESTION IS IN CASE I WIN THE JACKPOT, AND THE MONEY ONCE IT REACHES MY ACCOUNT AFTER FINISHING THE EURO TAXATION AND EVERYTHING ELSE, AM I TO PAY TAX ON THE SUM THAT I RECIEVED AS WINNINGS WHICH IS ALREADY TAX PAYED IN THE COUNTRY OF THE ORIGIN OF THE LOTTERY (OR IN THAT CASE; IF AT ALL IT IS TAXED THERE?!) I REPEAT, WILL I BE DOUBLE TAXED? OR IS IT THAT WHATEVER INCOME TAT I LATER GENERATE FROM THAT MONEY WHICH IS WON IS TO BE TAXED?

vinod bansal   15 August 2008 at 20:38

minimum wages act

Sir
I am in need of minimum wages act,plz provide if possible...Thanks
Regards
Vinod Bansal advocate

N.K.Assumi   15 August 2008 at 13:54

Drafting in reply to appeal petition in Civil case

Dear Sir,
Will you please help me to know the differences between Affidavit in Opposition and Order 41 Rule 22 Memorandum of Cross Objection / Order 41 Rule 22 Sub Rule (4) Memorandum of Objections under CPC.

ANURAG   15 August 2008 at 02:11

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CAN A NON MEMBER TO STATE LEGISLATURES IN INDIA BE ALLOWED TO SERVE AS A MINISTER FOR A PERIOD MORE THAN SIX MONTHS AS PER ARTICLE 164 CLAUSE 4. SAY IF GOV. CHANGES WITHOUT DISSOLUTION OF THE HOUSE AND THE PERSON WHO HAS ALREDY SERVED AS A MINISTER IN PREV. GOVT.FOR 6 MONTHS. IS HE ELIGIBLE FOR ANOTHER SIX MONTHS AS A MINISTER. DOES IT COMES UNDER THE DISCRETIONARY POWER OF THE GOVERNOR. WHAT CASES CAN THROW MORE LIGHT ON THIS.

sampoorna   14 August 2008 at 21:51

famaily court right

this is sampoorna many of you no me very well i asked many queries about my case and many of my quries are solved now, the query is since my husband upsacnading from last 3 years my maintance case is pending in famaily court of secunderabad, there recentely i given an pitition to the court that my fathear-in-law know s my husband whereabouts with a evidence of affadivitti which is given by my fathear-in-law to bar-counsil that his son is in u.s.a and working in u.s.a his son depuetd him for recalll pitition for cc no 473 which is pending in criminal court of nampally for crime 498.the famaily court judge seeing that evidence he issued notices to my father-in-law to furnish my husband address of u.s.a but there my father-in-law expressed to that court that he don't know the whereabouts of his son. the justice had declared to me that he have no right to force my fathear-in-law to furnish my husband address.even though having an evidence.

so, what i should do it,in this.please suggest me the best..

thank you,
sampoorna