Rameshchandran
20 June 2008 at 14:19
Dear sir,
I would like to know about the present position of the cases related to the excercise of powers by the high court under Artice 226 even though an alternative remedy is available under the statue.
Pls provide me the latest judgement with regard to the above position.
Expecting your co-operation and help in the matter.
thanking you
yours faithfully
Rameshchandran
Rama Verma
20 June 2008 at 11:59
please make clear what are certain acts which are applicable to public company but not private limited company
Rama Verma
20 June 2008 at 11:48
what are the exemption for forming private limited company
Rama Verma
20 June 2008 at 11:23
how small company is formed.whether moa.aoa,share,director are required to be made
Rama Verma
20 June 2008 at 11:23
how small company is formed.whether moa.aoa,share,director are required to be made
rama
20 June 2008 at 11:13
how a small company can be formed.whether share,director,moa,aoa is necassary
Mukul Aggarwal
20 June 2008 at 10:36
Sir,
How to calculate stamp duty on amended partnership deed where 4 person are becoming partners in the firm with the capital of 10 thousand each...
Alluri Sivaji Raju
20 June 2008 at 06:58
Hi friends! in a pending creditor Insolvancy petition the Respondent / Debtor sold his another property which was not shown in the schedule of the pending petition, without taking any consideration only with a view to defrauding the creditors. The said sale transaction is within the limitation to set a side the sale transaction i.e.90 days. The petitioner / Creditor neither filed another creditor I.P. nor filed a petitioner for add the recently sold property schedule by amending the pending petition. Please advice. What type of remedy the Petitioner / Creditor have for set aside the sale deed which was executed recentsly by the Respondent/Debtor.
Member Strength 9,61,219 and growing..
© 2023 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
consumer forum judgment
one nationalized bank brought a complain against a lawyer that he intentionally make a legal opinion regarding a property. the nationalized bank make a complain before the state consumer forum of West Bengal. they complained that the lawyer negligently does not search the property details from the concerned registry office and make this legal opinion regarding this property. bank said the lawyer is negligent to his work but fact is that the lawyer searched the property from the concerend registry office were the public records are not available. the title deed was for the year 1959. this report was given to the bank as a legal opinion only not to pass any loan but the said bank wrongfully and illegaly with malafide intension by scepgotting the lawyer initiated a potracted litigation against the lawyer before the state consumer forum and asking a damarage for Rs. 1 Crore but till date they have not taken any legal action against the borrower.in this regard you are requested kindly help thelawyer by giving your esteem opinion and judgment which was passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, if any or any other related judgment/judgments.