Anonymous
07 January 2024 at 11:27
Is legal notice to defendant mandatory before filing suit for sp. performance of contract
Anonymous
06 January 2024 at 20:29
Dear sir,
We are living in an apartment in Chennai. Our house is in first floor and above it is terrace. One of the apartment owner has kept many plants in common terrace area and it is causing leakage inside our house. He is not accepting that the leakage is due to the plants kept in terrace and refusing to remove the plant pots from terrace. Could you please suggest what is the procedure to deal with this in the apartment?
Anonymous
06 January 2024 at 20:12
Respected Experts,
I purchased a TV from a dealer, and unfortunately, within the warranty period, the TV has ceased to function. The challenge I'm facing is that there is no service center for this particular TV brand in my state. The service center, which is located in another state, has advised me to send the TV to them for repairs. However, they've also mentioned that if any damage occurs during transportation, I risk losing the warranty.
Given this situation, I'm hesitant to take the risk of sending the TV to another state. Therefore, I am inquiring whether I can claim warranty services from the dealer in my city.
Anonymous
06 January 2024 at 14:10
Can I file Insolvency against Company as an employee? Company has kept salary pending since last 4 month
Asokkumar Manickam
06 January 2024 at 05:12
However, attestation by a person, who has an interest in the subject matter of document attested stands on a distinct footing. Attestation by such a person raises the prima facie presumption that he knows the contents and acquiesces in the disposition of the property by the deed he attests.
Is there any Supreme Court verdicts to support the above points
Anonymous
05 January 2024 at 20:17
Can trachers of private unaided school in Maharashtra file writ against school management which is involved in unfair means of employment. Teachers have ZP approval also . Education officer made many reports about irregularity and currupt practices of present school management
RAMPRASAD NANGEDDA
05 January 2024 at 15:01
This bring to kind notice that our family is 3 brothers 1 sisiter.Property problem will issued the our family members.
1.One sister is before 1986 married his property issued the 0.50 cents
2.3 Brothers will same 0.50 cents part ion deed in our family.
3.Balance property is 0.50 cents grand mother name.
4.0.10 cents property is grandfather name.
His Father, Mother died. How to solve the property problem.whos is eligible and uneligible persons.
Kindly arrange the solution as soon as possible.
With Thanks & Regards,
N.Ramprasad
Anonymous
05 January 2024 at 13:08
2 months ago I started using telegram and I went on a group there was a girl saying vc available so to see if it was real I DM her and she said 80 rupee and I did payment but she didn't vc now after 2 months someone call me and says that this girl is arrested and are asking 3600 rupee and saying if I didn't do payment they will capture my parents PLEASE HELP
Member Strength 9,47,361 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rent accomodation lndlord is fake known subsequently]
I AM ANIL GHAISAS DOMBIVLI
I HAVE RESIDENCE IN RENTAL ACCOMMODATION
IAM THERE SINCE 1959 I HAVE DEALT WITH HIM SINCE THEN AND IN 1980
I HAVE ENTERED AGREEMENT WITH HIM
SUBSEQUENTLY, HE TRIED TO EVICT US FROM TENOMENT FORCEFULLY.
HE FILED A SUIT WHICH HAS PROCEED TILL HIGH COST
WHER IN HIS wp 3148 WAS REJECTED AND OUR ACTION WAS APPROVED
DENYING THIS JUDGEMENT IN 1992 HE CONTINUED HAVING AS PER HIS LAWS
THUS COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF COURT
THEREAFTER HE FILED A SUIT AGAINST ME AFTER A GAP OF 16 YEARS WITH THE SAME INTENTION.
THIS SUIT IS PENDING IN THE KALYAN CIVIL COURT FOR A DECISION
REBENYL. I KNEW THAT HE IS NOT A FULL PLEDGED OWNER IN THIS PROPERTY.
HIS RELATIVES FILED SUIT AGAINST HIM ON 25-04-90 WHICH WAS HEARD AND THE LANDLORD WAS PROHIBITED FROM INTERFERING IN THIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS PROHIBITED TO INCLUDE HIS 2 SONS' NAMES IN THE PROPERTY CARD (7/12 ABSTRACT) TILL THIS SUIT IS FINALLY DECIDED & HOWEVER THIS SUIT IS STILL CONTINUING IN KALYAN COURT FOR DECISION TILL TODAY.
THIS HE AGREED AND NOT MOVE TO ANY COURT FOR REVISION OR DECISION THS MEANS HE HAS AGREED TO ABIDE TOI FOLLOW THIS DECISION GIVEN ON 13-02-1991
INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIVES HE DID NOT FOLLOW ORDERS OF THE COURT AND CONTINUED TO BEHAVE AS BEFORE. HE CONTINUED TO INTERFERE AND ADDED HIS SON'S NAME ON THE 7/12 ABSTRACT USING ILLEGAL SOURCES & REMOVING ALL FOREFATHERS' NAMES AND TRYING TO PROVE THAT HE IS THE ONLY OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY.
I HAVE RAISED THIS QUESTION AND REQUESTED A LAWYER TO PUT THIS FACT BEFORE THE COURT AND PROVE HIM A FAKE AND ILLEGAL OWNER.
AS PER THE LAWYERS, HE SAYS THAT THERE IS NO MENTION OF CASE PROCEEDINGS THAT WE HAVE REFUSED HIM AS OWNER & HENCE WE HE IS UNABLE TO PROCEED.
MY QUESTION IS THAT WHEN THIS WAS NOTICED NOW WITH CORT ORDERS EVIDENCE HOW CAN I SUGGEST MY LAWRR TO BRING IT ON RECORD AND PROVE THAT THIS SUIT IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE IT IS FILED BY HIS SON, WHO HAS BEEN PROHIBITED FROM TAKING ANY SUCH AN ILLEGAL DECISION.
SHOULD I GO AHEAD PLEASE ADVISE?
IF ANY AUTHORITIES IN THIS PROCESS ARE GIVEN BY HIGH OR SUPREME COURT, PLEASE PROVIDE ME THE SAME SO THAT I WILL PROVIDE THEM IN COURT AND GET MY PROBLEM RESOLVED
REGARDS