Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Mohit Gupta   01 October 2008 at 15:19

house property+dowery case

Case history

We are 2 brothers and 1 sister earlier lived with our parents in Agra. I got a job in pune so I shifted in pune in july2005, after one year I get married and bring my wife in pune with my parents. My sister is also live in pune with her husband. And my elder brother with his wife lives in agra in our house which is in the name of my mother.

As all of our family members live in pune & my elder brother live in agra alone and he does not have any good source of income in agra so he also come to pune in January 2007 for a job searching living his wife in agra with her consent. due to misdirected brother’s wife by her family members when my brother goes to agra in may2007, she refuse to come here and after a mutual agreement with some old family members she agree that she lives in agra with her two child and her mother i.e. my elder brother’s mother in law up to november2007 and my brother sent him Rs. 4000/- per month for domestic expenditure. After that my brother went in Agra 2 times to bring her in pune, but she refuse by saying that she will teach us a lesson in court. (As per my brother view that she has an affair with her JIJA and her JIJA insists her not to come in pune.)

Now my elder brother’s wife in that house alone and neither she vacant neither the house nor she give the divorce to my brother. This is not possible for my brother to go back in Agra.
Moreover she filed a false dowery case upon us (myself and my sister are 4-5 year separated from the Agra)


Pls if possible can anyone give me a suitable view how to come out from this situation?

We want to overcome from both the siatuation

susanth nair s   01 October 2008 at 08:09

domesticviolenceact

is there any provision under the domestic violence act for the recovery of householdingarticles and ornaments of the aggreviedperson,which is kept by the respndents plz provide latest caselaw

KamalNayanSaxena   30 September 2008 at 22:35

Probationer completed eighteen months-terminated

A Medical Rep. on probation for the period of two years. After completion of eighteen months, terminated on ground 'services are not found up to the mark of satisfaction'

Kindly provide the latest case law regarding the status of probationer under ID Act.

Is there any chance for his reinstatment?

shivraj   30 September 2008 at 21:37

Hindu sucession act sec.6

in one case the first wife is demanded for partion in husband property which is ancestral in this time husband not supported to first wife and made will and sale deed of said property for not giving the benefit to first wife and discharge there right over property.After that wife filed civil suit against the husband for partition and demand the right over property.After few year husband died court note down following issues i.e
1.whether plaintiff proves that suit property is ancestral property of husband?
2.whether plaintiff proves that she is entited to claim partition and seperate possision in that property?if yes then her share? (imp issuee)plz reply.

Rekha.....   30 September 2008 at 21:01

I need proper proforma

Hello! Friends
My client is going to receive the cheque of PF from his company. The documents such as LC, Ration Card, Certificate of cast are mentioned his name as RAVINDRAKUMAR which is correct. But in his Said PF Account by mistake his name is entered as RAKESH for this he needs Affidavit. SO PL CORRECT THE FOLLOWING AFFIDAVIT ACCORDING LY OR ALTER AND GIVE ME ACCURATE PROFOMA OF AFFIDAVIT FOR THE PURPOSE
Affidavit
I ,the undersigned deponent:
Ravindrakumar....... , Aged:.... years, Hindu-Koli by religion, Occupation: Service,residing at......... State,India do hereby solemnly affirm and declare that:

That my name ”RAVINDRAKUMAR .........” is mentioned and recorded in my every documents and papers which is true and correct.

That my name ‘ RAKESH.......... ’ is entered and recorded by mistake in my Provident Fund Account No..........

THAT the purpose of making this affidavit is to confirm and rectify my above name i.e.‘RAVINDRAKUMAR ........’ and ‘RAKESH ....... is belong to one and the same person only and that is myself establish this confirmation with the concerned offices/departments and authorities, I do hereby execute this affidavit. This is the sole purpose of this affidavit.

THAT all the facts stated above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
THAT I know that to make a false affidavit is a criminal offence.

PLACE:……..
DATE……… ____________________
(DEPONENT)

Identified by me and the contents
explained to the deponent in
Vernacular language

__________________

Solemnly affirmed before me by the abovenamed deponent who has been identified by…………advocate
to whom I know personally.
Place:…..
Date……

rahul   30 September 2008 at 19:55

about cross -in-examination in criminal trial.

whether cross in examination can be reopened in the matter of section 138 of N.I.Act?

rahul   30 September 2008 at 19:46

human rights

what are the job oppertuinities for llm students in human rights.please give in details about it.

Tribhuwan Pandey   30 September 2008 at 19:19

SLP before Supreme Court

Conviction upheld by the High Court
Accused on bail directed to surrender if not be arrested. Bail bond forfeited.
Whether the accuse has to surrender for filing an appeal before the Supreme Court or his SLP can be entertained directly?

jayanttelang   30 September 2008 at 18:13

standing Orders and subsistence allwance

Dear Mr Harbhajansingh ji,once again i have a query regarding my matter.
In the recent past i received a letter from my company's HRD,In short their reference is as below-
1 There is no formal standing orders and you are governed by the rules/regulation & norms of the company which is in accordance with principle of natural justice.
2 It is a Domestic Inquiry- Domestic Tribunal hence the delinquent employee has to attend the Domestic Inquiry where the Domestic Tribunal has been constituted i.e,head office Ahmedabad.
3 There is no mandate to provide defence representative at the cost of employer.

Mr Harbhajansingh ji,i think they have not any certified standing orders,still they are giving me only 50% of my salary,while 7 months have been passed.
in this regard,kindly tell me what to do,& where would i file a complaint.
They are also making a barrier in the way of my Defence represintative (he is my co-employee,in my company,at other H.Q.)

After completion of six months,i sent a request letter to my HRD,regarding 75% of my salary,but he plainly denied to do so,
kindly guide me what to do now?i m waiting for your reply,eagerly!

Member (Account Deleted)   30 September 2008 at 18:13

difference betwen a lawyer and an advocate

what was the difference between a lawyer and an advocate.......?

does both are same or having differences..?