<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lawyersclubindia : Judiciary</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/</link>
<generator>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/</generator>
<item>
<title>Kerala High Court Madhu Lynching Case Marakkar v. State of Kerala and Connected Cases</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/kerala-high-court-madhu-lynching-case-marakkar-v-state-of-kerala-connected-cases-7614.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 17:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>A party that seeks registration of a trademark cannot subsequently contend that the same mark is merely descriptive in order to defeat a trademark infringement action.</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/a-party-that-seeks-registration-of-a-trademark-cannot-subsequently-contend-that-the-same-mark-is-merely-descriptive-in-order-to-defeat-a-trademark-infringement-action--7613.asp</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2026 15:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Accused has Absolute to use Section 161 Statements to Contradict withnesses during Cross-Examination: Kerala High Court</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/accused-has-absolute-to-use-section-161-statements-to-contradict-withnesses-during-cross-examination-kerala-high-court-7611.asp</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 17:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Negligence of the Highest order: NCDRC Holds Surgeon Liable for Removal of Healthy Kidney</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/medical-negligence-of-the-highest-order-ncdrc-holds-surgeon-liable-for-removal-of-healthy-kidney-7610.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 15:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Admission of claim by RP is a mere administrative act and does not extend limitation as acknowledgment of debt.</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/admission-of-claim-by-rp-is-a-mere-administrative-act-and-does-not-extend-limitation-as-acknowledgment-of-debt--7608.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2026 13:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Vested Right to Appointment Arises Merely from Position in a Select List: An Analysis of the Supreme Court's Decision in State of Karnataka v. Santhosh Kumar C. (2026 INSC 276) on the Scope and Limits of Select Lists in Statutory Recruitment under the Karnataka Gazetted Probationers Rules, 1997</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/no-vested-right-to-appointment-arises-merely-from-position-in-a-select-list-an-analysis-of-the-supreme-court-s-decision-in-state-of-karnataka-v-santhosh-kumar-c-2026-insc-276-on-the-scope-an-7607.asp</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contractual Bars and Arbitral Interest: Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Arbitrator's Power</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/contractual-bars-arbitral-interest-supreme-court-clarifies-limits-of-arbitrator-s-power-7605.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>State of Himachal Pradesh v. Surat Singh </title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/state-of-himachal-pradesh-v-surat-singh--7604.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Om Sakthi Sekar v V.Sukumar and Ors</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/om-sakthi-sekar-v-v-sukumar-ors-7603.asp</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Independent Streedhan Claims Under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act Cannot Stand: Law Limits the Adjudication of Stridhan Claims Strictly with the Substantive Claim Under the HMA</title>
<link>https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/independent-streedhan-claims-under-section-27-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-cannot-stand-law-limits-the-adjudication-of-stridhan-claims-strictly-with-the-substantive-claim-under-the-hma-7597.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Mar 2026 17:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Independent Streedhan Claims Under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act Cannot Stand: Law Limits the Adjudication of Stridhan Claims Strictly with the Substantive Claim Under the HMA]]>
</description>
<author>LCI Team</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
