Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 in 1 pages
dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

any minister does any work first know the fundamental rights in the constitution, if not no use electing such a person as your great rep to look after your interests, as he or she is bound to self attest his or her competency in any area of human activity! would u still have such wise representatives to wield so called License on your rights! if so better get screwed up, best of luck.


dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

a few days back some one as MOS- HOME MINISTRY said raping your own wife is no rape at all, is some kind of self attestation of that great worthy on his scholarship on religions, especially hinduism, do you agree that great idea, when any grievous injury is caused to your or that poor lady's body she could move FIR,before police, if police dos not register, she could go for private complaint before jurisdictional judicial crimes magistrate, what it means, would the great minister remove from law of crimes say cr.p.c r/w ipc section if the rape by her own husband caused grievous injury on her body...what do you call this audacity of the minster, might be holding some phd or honoris causa degree, would you like as a wife you could be raped by your husband and get caused a great grievous injury?


dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

see, schools and colleges conduct examination at the end of year on the supposed presumption that you attended the classes at least 75% classes, that gives you great right to answer just 5 questions against 10 questions n your question paper, you presume you are the master of subject but what you perhaps know in the text book just not even 2.5% of the book, but you say you got 99% marks what is is showing is some kind of self attestation of our knowledge base. but in fact you now big nothing in the said text book and if same questions are asked you may not get even 40% on those very 5 questions on which you got your so called 99%. is t not? that is your so called self attestation ideas, sir!


dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

Right once given never take it for granted as a license, like you do when you get driving license you thing you have a right run over pedestrians or people crossing roads, do u think that is your right, then you claim bail as a fundamental right...what kind of human behavior is at work today.


dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

tomar self attested his own alleged fake degrees in delhi govt and became law minister, though he could be illiterate to become a people representative but why he chose false prestige perception, is the ill of self attestation, that is common in most politicians holding doctorate degrees say honoris causa degree cannot be displayed along with one's name but fashion is that you put such degrees along with your name means 'honoris causa' is defeated in principle, that clearly shows such ..causa degree awarding university automatically withdraw such degrees, but there would be murders perpetrated like in UP on journalists , minor girls after raping the girls... that is the after effects of this great democracy as it understands democratic independence means great license to do any thing you as a politician you do today. see same way Art.25 is taken for granted by legislators, see in hindu religion in a secular democracy, govt cannot interfere with customs and traditions but see the saptapadi of hindu marriage is made a farce drama today when you as a hindu is allowed to divorce a woman and marry another girl, that way politicians polluted the religious sanctities that way there is the marriage as a sexual relationship contract and you could dissolve, that way every woman chastity is taken for granted is it not? if so, do you say sane to interfere with customs nd traditions when those hings are your fundamental right, that way politician takes his powers to do anything with our personal private life as politicians like...one day sooner politicians would say one's wife is a prostitute and prostitution as a fundamental religious right, by amending Art.25 but these worthies would fase heat from other relgionists too soon. you cannot self attest as a politicians you can mangle others private religious customs, that way earlier in religious history there were internecine wars and even destroyed kingdoms that led to the fall of divine right theory kings wielded saying gods permitted them to do what king wanted but in 12th century on renaissance surfaced and magna carta surfaced in then England, every one of you know, so too french revolution, then several more...ia it not? do we want such resurrections again sirs!


dr g balakrishnan
Wrote on 15 June 2015  

that is how politicians get away with their affidavits during election time, self attestation is ok in the case of ordinary people, not politicians.


TGK REDDI
Wrote on 03 June 2015  

Shri Subhas Chandra Mazumdar Dear Sir I appreciate your comment.


Subhas Chandra Mazumder
Wrote on 15 May 2015  

I think self attestation is more secure in that sense that the person himself will be liable if it is false and shall be prosecuted in the eye of law and it is more convenient than before to send a self attested copy to the concerned office whenever required without loss of time.


kiran 11111
Wrote on 22 March 2015  

Has self attested legal sanctity ?


RAJ KISHORE VAISH
Wrote on 07 March 2015  

A good measure ..


You need to be logged in to post comment





×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu

web analytics